The Reconciliation Of Civil Law and Common Law Traditıons

BOOKS

Arslan, Ramazan/Yılmaz, Ejder/Ayvaz, Sema Taşpınar/

Hanağası, Emel: Medenî Usul Hukuku (2020)

Bell, John/Boyron, Sophie/Whittaker, Simon: Principles of

French Law (2008)

Born, Gary: International Commercial Arbitration (2014)

O’Malley, Nathan D.: Rules of Evidence in International

Arbitration: An Annotated Guide (2019).

Tanrıver Süha: Medenî Usûl Hukuku Cilt I (2021)

Waincymer, Jeff: Procedure and Evidence in International

Arbitration (2012)

ARTICLES

Applegate, John S.: Witness Preparation, 68(2) Tex. L. Rev. 277

(1989)

Goering, J. Lyn Entrikin: Legal Fiction of the “Unpublished”

Kind: The Surreal Paradox of No-Citation Rules and the Ethical Duty

of Candor, 1(1) Seton Hall Cir. Rev. 27 (2005)

Helmholz, Richard H.: Origins of the Privilege against SelfIncrimination: The Role of the European Ius Commune, 65 N.Y.U. L.

Rev. 962 (1990)

IBA Task Force for the Revision of the IBA Rules on the Taking

of Evidence in International Arbitration/Consolidated

Amendments: Commentary on the Revised Text of the 2020 IBA

Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (Jan. 2021)

106

Jablonski, John J./Dahl, Alexander R.: The 2015 Amendments to

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Guide to Proportionality in

Discovery and Implementing a Safe Harbor for Preservation, 82(4) Def.

Counsel J. 411 (Oct. 2015)

Kerr, Michael: Concord and Conflict in International Arbitration,

13(2) Arb. Int’l 121 (1997)

Kubalczyk, Anna Magdalena: Evidentiary Rules in International

Arbitration – A Comparative Analysis of Approaches and the Need for

Regulation, 3(1) Groningen Journal of International Law 85 (2015)

Prevot, Clémence: The Taking of Evidence in International

Commercial Arbitration: A Compromise Between Common Law and

Civil Law, 71(2) Dis. Res. J. 73 (2016)

Reymond, Claude: Civil Law and Common Law Procedures:

Which is the More Inquisitorial? A Civil Lawyer’s Response, 5 ARB.

INT’L 357 (1989)

Rubinstein, Javier: International Commercial Arbitration:

Reflections at the Crossroads of the Common Law and Civil Law

Traditions Perspective, 5 CHI. J. INT’L. L. 303 (2004)

Tanrıver, Süha: Hukuk Yargısı Bağlamında Bilirkişilikle İlgili

Temel Problemler ve Çözüm Arayışları (Dokuz Eylul Universitesi

Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi, 2010/Cilt:11, s. 575-594)

BLOG POSTS

Alonso, Trinidad/Scherpf, Georg: Are the Prague Rules Suitable

for Investment Arbitration?, KLUWER ARBITRATION BLOG (Aug. 11,

2019), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/08/11/arethe-prague-rules-suitable-for-investment-arbitration/.

Baysal, Pelin/Keser, Aytug: Arbitration Procedures and Practice

in Turkey: Overview (Sept. 12, 2017), http://gun.av.tr/tr/arbitrationprocedures-and-practice-in-turkey-overview-2/.

Flägel, Peter/Myers, Terry/ Nagel, Jeffrey L./Kurtz, Birgit:

Discovery – A Powerful U.S. Litigation Tool – Sometimes Even in 

107

Germany (Jan. 7, 2016), https://www.gibbonslaw.com/discovery---apowerful-us-litigation-tool---sometimes-even-in-germany/

Gorst, Duncan/Tutt, Stephanie: 2020 Revision of the IBA Rules

on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, KLUWER

ARBITRATION BLOG (Mar. 28, 2021), http://arbitrationblog.

kluwerarbitration.com/2021/03/28/2020-revision-of-the-iba-rules-onthe-taking-of-evidence-in-international-arbitration/.

Haydn-Williams, Jonathan: Civil Litigation: ‘Discovery’ is not

the same As ‘Disclosure’ (Forensic E-Providers Please Note) (Aug. 22,

2017), http://gdknowledge.co.uk/civil-litigation-discovery-is-not-thesame-as-disclosure-forensic-e-providers-please-note/.

Khvalei, Vladimir/ Khrapoutski, Alexandre/ Perepelynska,

Olena/Czech, Konrad: The Prague Rules on conduct of the taking

evidence: an alternative to the IBA Rules? (May 24, 2018), available at

https://praguerules.com/upload/iblock/2d6/2d6ddc744c3efe9101b60dc

2fdb59ab6.pdf.

Kocur, Michal: Why Lawyers from Civil Law Jurisdictions Do Not

Need the Prague Rules, KLUWER ARBITRATION BLOG (Aug. 19, 2018),

http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/08/19/why-lawyersfrom-civil-law-jurisdictions-do-not-need-the-prague-rules/.

Kurtz, Birgit/ Pyenson, Arlen/ Bouhabib, Amal: United States in

Getting the Deal Through – Arbitration (2014),

https://www.crowell.com/files/Arbitration-in-the-United-States.pdf.

Lu, Jue Jun: Witness Preparation in International Arbitration:

Where to Start and Where to Stop?, PRACTICAL LAW ARBITRATION

BLOG (Dec. 7, 2016), http://arbitrationblog.practicallaw.com/witnesspreparation-in-international-arbitration-where-to-start-and-where-tostop/.

Spencer, Elissa: Confidentiality, Privilege or Both? (Dec. 20,

2017), https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/

publications/tyl/topics/ethics/confidentiality-privilege-or-both.html.

Starr, Paul/ Sajnani, Suraj/Chick, Hermia: Document

Production Under the Common Law and Civil Law: Reconciling the

Differences Through the IBA Rules, KWM (Nov. 1, 2017),

https://www.kwm.com/en/au/knowledge/insights/documentproduction-common-civil-law-iba-rules-differences-20171030

108

Tian, Charles Tian: The Prague Rules and the IBA Rules on

Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration: Friends or Foes?,

TRANSNATIONAL NOTES (Feb. 6, 2019), https://blogs.law.nyu. edu/

transnational/2019/02/the-prague-rules-and-the-iba-rules-on-taking-of

-evidence-in-international-arbitration-friends-or-foes/

Veit, Marc D.: Cross-Border Pre-Trial Discovery in Switzerland

(Mar. 2007), https://www.walderwyss.com/publications/420.pdf.

SURVEYS

Queen Mary, White&Case: 2012 International Arbitration

Survey: Current and Preferred Practices in the Arbitral Process (2012)

Queen Mary, White&Case: 2015 International Arbitration

Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration

(2015)

Queen Mary, White&Case: 2018 International Arbitration

Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration (2018)