Yapay Zeka Teknolojilerinin Ortaya Koyduğu Buluşların Patentlenebilirliği

Abbott, R.: Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Intellectual Property:

Protecting Computer-Generated Works in the United Kingdom, Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies,

Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2017, https://ssrn.com/abstract=

3064213 adresinden ulaşılabilir (Big Data and Intellectual Property).

Abbott, R.: Hal the Inventor, Big Data and Its Use by Artificial Intelligence, 2015 s. 1-38, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?

abstract_id=2565950 adresinden ulaşılabilir (Hal the Inventor).

Abbott, R.: I Think Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 4,

2016, s. 1079-1125 (I Think Therefore I Invent).

Abbott, R.: The Reasonable Robot: Artificial Intelligence and Law,

Cambridge University Press, 2020 (Reasonable Robot).

Alarie, B./Niblett, A./Yoon, A. H.: How Artificial Intelligence Will Affect the Practice of Law, University of Toronto Journal, Vol. 68, No.

1, 2018, s. 106-124.

Ali, F.: Digitalised Invention, Decentralised Patents System: The Impact 

of Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence on the Patent Prosecution,

2020, s. 1-30, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=

3590336 adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Alpaydın, E.: Yapay Öğrenme: Yeni Yapay Zekâ, Tellekt, Can Sanat

Yayınları, İstanbul, Aralık 2020.

Amoridis, K.: The Timeline of E-personhood: a Hasty Assumption or a

Realistic Challange, 25.04.2019, https://www.maastrichtuniversity.

nl/blog/2019/04/timeline-e-personhood-hasty-assumption-or-realis

tic-challenge adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Arkan, S.: Ticari İşletme Hukuku, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma

Enstitüsü, 23. Baskı, Ankara, 2017.

Asay, C. D.: Artificial Stupidity, William&Mary Law Review, Vol. 61, 

No. 5, 2020, s. 1187-1257.

Ayhan, R./Çağlar, H./Yıldız, B./İmirlioğlu, D.: Sınai Mülkiyet Hukuku, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.

138 Kaynakça

Bayraktaroğlu-Özçelik, G./Özçelik, Ş. B.: Use of AI-Based Technologies in International Commercial Arbitration, European Journal of

Law and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2021, s. 1-21.

Bessen, J./Maskin, E.: Sequential Innovation, Patents and Imitation,

Rand Journal of Economics Vol. 40, No. 4, Kış 2009, s. 611-635.

Biber, A. E.: Türkiye’de Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruması Ekonomik Büyüme ve Teknoloji İhracatı İlişkisinin Karşılaştırılmalı Analizi, AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2016, s. 61-

88.

Bo, Z.: Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Protection---Judicial Practice in Chinese Courts, https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/

about-ip/en/artificial_intelligence/conversation_ip_ai/pdf/ms_china_

1_en.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Boden, M. A.: Artificial Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford

University Press, 2018.

Bozkurt Yüksel, E. A.: Yapay Zekâ Buluşlarının Patentlenmesi, Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi, No. 11, 2018, s. 585-622.

Bozkurt-Yüksel, A. E.: Buluşçu Yapay Zekâ ve Patent Hukuku, Aristo

Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2020 (Buluşçu Yapay Zekâ).

Bridy, A.: Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent

Author, Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 5, 2012, s. 1-28.

Brynjolfsson, E./McAfee, A.: Yapay Zekânın Vaat Ettikleri, Dijital Dönüşüm: Yapay Zekâ, Harvard Business Review Press, Optimist Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2020, s. 19-56.

Buluş, G. C./Bakırtaş, İ.: Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet 

Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme, Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2019, s. 261-278.

Burri, T.: The EU is Right to Refuse Legal Personality for Artificial Intelligence https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/opinion/the-euis-right-to-refuse-legal-personality-for-artificial-intelligence/ adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Butler, L.: World First Patent Applications Filed for Inventions Generated Solely by Artificial Intelligence, https://www.surrey.ac.uk/news/

world-first-patent-applications-filed-inventions-generated-solelyartificial-intelligence adresinden tarihinde ulaşılabilir.

Kaynakça 139

Büyüközkan-Feyzioğlu, G.: Dijitalleşen Dünyada Yapay Zekâ, Gelişen 

Teknolojiler ve Hukuk II: Yapay Zekâ, ed. Aksoy-Retornaz, E. 

E./Güçlütürk, O. G., On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Nisan

2021, s. 1-20.

Chang, K.: Hal, Call Your Office: Computers That Act Like Physicists, 

Nisan 2009, https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/science/07robot.

html adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Clifford, R. D.: Intellectual Property in the Era of the Creative Computer Program: Will the True Creator Please Stand Up?, Tulane Law 

Review, Vol. 71, No. 6, 1997, s. 1675-1703.

Crawford, K./Dobbe, R./Dryer, T./Fried, G./Green, B./Kaziunas,

E./Kak, A./Mathur, V./Mcelroy, E./Sanchez, A. N./Raji, D./

Rankın, J. L./Richardson,/R. Schultz, J./West, S. M./Whittaker,

M.: AI Now 2019 Report, New York, AI Now Institute, 2019,

https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2019_Report.html adresinden

ulaşılabilir.

Cubert, J. A./Bone, R.G.A.: The Law of Intellectual Property Created 

by Artificial Intelligence, Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, ed. Barfield, W./Pagallo, U., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, s. 411-427.

Çağlar, H.: Patent Hukukunda Önalım Hakkı, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk 

Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2006, s. 77-92.

Çetin, S./Kumkumoğlu, K.: Yapay Zekâ Stratejileri ve Hukuk, Gelişen 

Teknolojiler ve Hukuk II: Yapay Zekâ, ed. Aksoy-Retornaz, E. 

E./Güçlütürk, O. G., On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Nisan

2021, s. 21-74.

Çaylı, M.: Mikroişlemci Nedir?, 2020, https://teknoloji.org/mikroislemci

-nedir/ adresinden ulaşılabilir.

da Silva, P.: David Cope and Experiments in Musical Intelligence, s. 1-

86, https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/MUSIC124/

Διαλέξεις/da-silva-david-cope-and-emi.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Davies, C. R.: An Evalutionary Step in Intellectual Property RightsArtificial Intelligence And Intellectual Property, Computer

Law&Security Review, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2011, s. 601-619.

140 Kaynakça

Deshpande, R./Kamath, K.: Patentability of Inventions Created by AI---

the DABUS Claims from an Indian Perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Law&Practice, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2020, s. 879-889.

Domingos, P.: Master Algoritma- Yapay Öğrenme Hayatımızı Nasıl Değiştirecek?, Paloma Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2019.

Dormehl, L.: Are computers creative?, 08.12.2015, https://phys.org/

news/2015-12-creative.html adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Dülger, M. V.: Yapay Zekâ Teknolojileri ve Veri Koruma Hukuku, Şubat

2021.

Eagleman, D./Brandt, A.: Yaratıcı Tür, Bkz Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2019.

Ebrahim, T. Y.: Artificial Intelligence Inventions&Patent Disclosure,

Penn State Law Review, Vol. 125, No. 1, 2020, s. 147-221.

Eidenmüller, H.: Robots’ Legal Personality, 08.03.2017, https://www.

law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2017/03/robots’-legal-persona

lity adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Eisenberg, A.: When a Gizmo Can Invent a Gizmo, Kasım 1999, https://

archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/11/circuits/

articles/25next.html adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Engel, A.: Can a Patent Be Granted for an AI-Generated Invention?,

GRUR International, Vol. 69, No. 11, 2020, s. 1123-1129.

EPO: Artificial Intelligence, https://www.epo.org/news-events/in-focus/

ict/artificial-intelligence.html adresinden ulaşılabilir.

EPO: Press Communiqué on Decisions J 8/20 and J 9/20 of the Legal 

Board of Appeal, https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appe

als/communications/2021/20211221.html adresinden ulaşılabilir.

European Commission: On Artificial Intelligence-A European Approach to Excellence and Trust, White Paper, Brüksel, 19.02.2020, s. 1-

26, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/commission-whitepaper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir 

(Excellence and Trust).

European Commission: Artificial Intelligence for Europe, Communication, 2018, 237 final, s. 1-19, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/

EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0237&from=EN adresinden 

ulaşılabilir.

Kaynakça 141

European Parliament: Resolution on Civil Law Rules on Robotics, 

2017, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-

0051_EN.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Firth-Butterfield, K./Chae, Y./Allgrove, B./Kitsara, I.: Artificial Intelligence Collides with Patent Law, White Paper, World Economic 

Forum, Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Nisan 2018, s.

1-23, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_48540_WP_End_of_

Innovation_Protecting_Patent_Law.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Fraser, E.: Computers as Inventors-Legal Policy Implications of Artificial Intelligence on Patent Law, SCRIPTed, Vol. 13, No. 3, Aralık

2016, s. 305-333.

Gervais, D.: Exploring the Interfaces Between Big Data and Intellectual 

Property Law, JIPITEC, 2019, s. 1-25.

Greenberg, A.: Protecting Virtual Things: Patentability of Artificial Intelligence Technology For the Internet of Things, Law Review of

Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property, Vol. 60, No. 2, s.

328-351.

Güçlütürk, O. G./Cankat, R.: Yapay Zekâ ile Oluşturulan Ürünlerin

Eser Niteliği ve Eser Sahipliği Meselesi, Gelişen Teknolojiler ve

Hukuk II: Yapay Zekâ, ed. Aksoy-Retornaz, E. E./Güçlütürk, O.

G., s. 195-222, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Nisan 2021.

Güçlütürk, O. G./Kadıoğlu, Y. M.: Yapay Zekâ ve Regülasyon, Gelişen

Teknolojiler ve Hukuk II: Yapay Zekâ, ed. Aksoy-Retornaz, E.

E./Güçlütürk, O. G., On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Nisan

2021, s. 75-118.

Güneş, İ.: Sınai Mülkiyet Kanunun Işığında Uygulamalı Patent ve Faydalı Model Hukuku, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2020.

Gürzumar, O. B.: Franchise Sözleşmeleri ve Bu Sözleşmelerin Temelini 

Oluşturan “Sistem”lerin Hukuken Korunması, Beta Basım Yayım 

Dağıtım A. Ş., İstanbul, 1995.

Hartmann, C./Allan, J. E. M./Hugenholts, P. B./Quintais, J. P./

Gervais, D.: Trends and Developments in Artificial Intelligence:

Challenges to the Intellectual Property Rights Framework, 2020,

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Trends_and_Development

s_in_Artificial_Intelligence-1.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

142 Kaynakça

Hattenbach, B./Glucoft, J.: Patents in an Era of Infinite Monkeys and 

Artificial Intelligence, Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 19,

Sonbahar 2015, s. 32-51.

Hemel, D. J./Larrimore Ouellette, L.: Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate,Texas Law Review, Vol. 92, 2013, s. 303-382.

Hocaoğlu, H.: Yapay Zekâ Ürünleri Üzerinde Fikri Haklar, 2021, s. 1-

28, https://www.mondaq.com/pdf/1037418.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir. 

Iglesias, M./Shamuilia, S./Anderberg, A.: Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence: A Literature Review, Lüksemburg, 2019, s. 1-

29, https://sites.les.univr.it/cybercrime/wp-content/uploads/2021/

05/IP-and-AI.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Independent High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: A 

Definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines, 2019, s. 

1-7, https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2019-12/ai-definition.pdf

adresinden ulaşılabilir.

İstanbul, Ankara ve İzmir Barosu: Yapay Zekâ Çağında Hukuk, 2019, 

s. 1-117, https://www.istanbulbarosu.org.tr/files/docs/Yapay_Zeka_

Caginda_Hukuk2019.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Joshi, N.: 7 Types of Artificial Intelligence, Haziran 2019, https://www.

forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/06/19/7-types-of-artificialintelligence/?sh=5153b921233e adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Kangal, Z.: Yapay Zekâ ve Ceza Hukuku, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Mayıs 2021.

Kanwar, S./Evenson, R.: Does intellectual property protection spur 

technological change?, Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University 

Press, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2003, s. 235-264.

Kara, E.: Sınai Mülkiyet Haklarının Haksız Rekabet Hükümleri Çerçevesinde Korunması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Haziran 2020.

Karaaslan, P.: Buluşlara İlişkin Bir Fikri Mülkiyet Stratejisi Olarak

“Stratejik Yayım (Defensive Publishing)”, Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020, s. 698-729.

Kavuşturan, E.: Reforming U.S. Patent Law to Enable Access To Essential Medicines in the Era of Artificial Intelligence, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2020, 

s. 51-90.

Kaynakça 143

Keats, J.: John Koza Has Built an Invention Machine, Nisan 2006, 

https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2006-04/john-koza-has-builtinvention-machine/ adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Kılıçoğlu, A. M.: Sınai Haklarla Karşılaştırılmalı Fikri Haklar, Turhan

Kitabevi, Ankara, 2019.

Kim, D.: AI-Generated Inventions: Time to Get the Record Straight?, 

GRUR International, Vol. 69, No. 5, 2020, s. 443-456.

Kiper, S.: Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Korunması Ekonomik Büyüme 

Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerinde Bir Uygulama, Gece 

Kitaplığı, Ankara, 2020.

Knutson, K. R.: Anything you can do, AI can’t do better: An Analysis of 

Conception as a Requirement For Patent Inventorship and a Rationale For Excluding AI Inventors, Cybaris: An Intellectual Property 

Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2020, s. i-29.

Kop, M.: AI&Intellectual Property: Towards and Articulated Public 

Domain, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 

2020, s. 297-341.

Köker, A. R./Yalçıner, U. G.: Uzman Gözüyle Patent ve Faydalı Modelden Kaynaklanan Uyuşmazlıklar, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2020.

Lauber-Rönsberg, A./Hetmank, S.: The concept of authorship and inventorship under pressure: Does artificial intelligence shift paradigms?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law&Practice, Vol. 14, No.

7, Temmuz 2019, s. 570-579.

Lee, E. A.: Dijital Ruh: İnsan ve Teknoloji Arasındaki Yaratıcı Ortaklık, 

Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2019.

Mammen, C.E./Richey, C.: AI and IP: Are Creativity and Inventorship 

Inherently Human Activities?, FUI Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 

2020, s. 275-292.

Mandel, G.: The Non-Obvious Problem: How the Indeterminate Nonobviousness Standard Produces Excessive Patent Grants, University 

of California Davis Law Review, Vol. 42, 2008, s. 57-128.

Marchi, S.: Artificial Intelligence and Inventions, http://www.hfgip.

com/news/artificial-intelligence-and-inventions adresinden ulaşılabilir.

144 Kaynakça

Mazzi, F.: Patentability of AI Generated Drugs, EPLR, Vol. 4, No. 1, 

2020, s. 17-33.

McLaughin, M.: Computer-Generated Inventions, Working Paper, 2018, 

s. 1-32, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=309

7822 adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Nard, C. A.: The Law of Patents, Aspen Publishers, Frederick, 2008.

Ng, A.: İlk Yapay Zekâ Projenizi Nasıl Seçersiniz, Dijital Dönüşüm: Yapay Zekâ, Harvard Business Review Press, Optimist Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2020, s. 127-139.

Nilsson, N. J.: Yapay Zekâ: Geçmişi ve Geleceği, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi 

Yayınevi, İkinci Basım, İstanbul, Şubat 2019.

Nussim, J./Sorek, A.: Theorizing Tax Incentives for Innovation, Virginia

Tax Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2017, s. 25-82.

Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.

com/us/definition/english/agent-noun adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Özçelik, Ş. B.: Yapay Zekânın Veri Koruma, Sorumluluk ve Fikri Mülkiyet Açısından Ortaya Çıkardığı Hukuki Gereksinimler, Adalet Dergisi, No. 66, 2021, s. 87-116.

Özkök-Gökmen, B.: Patent Hakkının Sınırları ve İstisnaları (Kamu Sağlığı Gerekçesi Özelinde İncelenmesi), Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara,

2020.

Parlakyıldız, F.M./Güvel, E.A.: Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları ve Bu Hakları 

Korumanın Önemi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 

8, No. 4, Ekim 2015, s. 29-39.

Patil, U.: South Africa Grants A Patent with An Artificial Intelligence

(AI) System As The Inventor-World’s First!, 19.10.2021,

https://www.mondaq.com/india/patent/1122790/south-africa-grantsa-patent-with-an-artificial-intelligence-ai-system-as-the-inventorworld39s-first adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Pearlman, R.: Recognizing Artificial Intelligence, (AI) as Authors and

Inventors Under, U.S. Intellectual Property Law, Richmond Journal

of Law&Technology, Vol. XXIV, No. 2, 2018, s. 1-38.

Penrose, R.: Kralın Yeni Aklı Bilgisayar, Yasa ve Fizik Yasaları, Koç 

Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2020.

Kaynakça 145

President of the European Patent Office: Update of Legal Aspects of 

Artificial Intelligence and Patents, CA/PL 5/20, Münih, 23.10.2020, 

s. 1-11, https://www.epo.org/modules/epoweb/acdocument/epoweb

2/468/en/CA-PL_5-20_en.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Ramalho, A.: Patentability of AI-Generated Inventions-Is a Reform of 

the Patent System Needed?, Summary Report published under the 

2017 Collaborative Research Project on Harmonization of Industrial 

Property Right Systems, 2017, https://www.iip.or.jp/e/summary/pdf/

detail2017/e29_02_Ramalho.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Rao, N.: Are AI-Generated Inventions the Future?, 17.02.2021, https://

www.inta.org/perspectives/are-ai-generated-inventions-the-future/

adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Ravid, S. Y./Lui, X. J.: When Artificial Intelligence Systems Produce Inventions: An Alternative Model for Patent Law At 3A Era, Cardozo

Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2018, s. 2215-2262.

Reed, C.: How should we regulate artificial intelligence?, Philosophical 

Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical, Physical and 

Engineering Sciences, 2018, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/

10.1098/rsta.2017.0360 adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Reese, B.: Yapay Zekâ Çağı, Say Yayınları, İstanbul, 2020.

Reinbold, P. M.: Taking Artificial Intelligence Beyond the Turing Test, 

Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2020, 2020, s. 874-906.

Rekabet Kurumu: Rekabet Terimleri Sözlüğü, Beşinci Baskı, Nisan

2014.

Rouhiainen, L.: Yapay Zekâ Geleceğimizle İlgili Bugün Bilmemiz Gereken 101 Şey, Pegasus Yayınları, İstanbul, 2020.

Samore, W.: Artificial Intelligence and the Patent System: Can a New 

Tool Render a Once Patentable Idea Obvious, Syracuse Journal of 

Science and Technology Law, Vol. 29, Sonbahar 2013, s. 113-142.

Sarı, O.: Yapay Zekânın Fikri Mülkiyet Hukukuna Göre Korunması, İzmir Barosu Dergisi, Ocak 2020, s. 53-116.

Say, C.: 50 Soruda Yapay Zekâ, 17. Baskı, İstanbul, 2020.

Schuster, W. M.: Artificial Intelligence and Patent Ownership, Washington&Lee Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, 2018, s. 1945-2004.

146 Kaynakça

Schwab, K.: Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi, Optimist Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 

2016.

Stephens, K.: Who owns an AI generated invention?, 30.11.2019, https://

www.infolaw.co.uk/newsletter/2019/11/owns-ai-generated-inven

tion/ adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Suluk, C./Karasu, R./Nal, T.: Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku, 4. Baskı, Seçkin

Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2020.

Şehirali, F. H.: Patent Hakkının Korunması, Turhan Kitapevi, Ankara,

1998.

Tao, J./Shuijing, H.: Intellectual Property Protection for AI-Related Inventions in Japan, International Conference on Virtual Reality and 

Intelligent Systems, 2019, s. 286-289.

Tekinalp, Ü.: Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku, Arıkan Basım Yayım Dağıtım 

Ltd. Şti., Dördüncü Bası, İstanbul, 2005 (2005).

Tekinalp, Ü.: Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku, Vedat Kitapçılık, Beşinci Bası, İstanbul, 2012 (2012).

Tripathi, S./Ghatak, C.: Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property 

Law, Christ University Law Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2017, s. 83-97.

Turing, A.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind, Vol. LIX, No.

236, Ekim 1950, s. 433-460.

Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri: https://sozluk.gov.tr adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Türk Patent: https://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/TURKPATENT/resources/

temp/522B990B-E529-4378-8287-66E77494B4FA.pdf;jsessionid=

945B713B5C15A43FD9752DB2AF56E9A0 adresinden ulaşılabilir.

USPTO: Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, https://www.uspto.

gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/index.html adresinden ulaşılabilir.

USPTO: New PE2E Search Tool Using AI Search Features,

https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/og-aiforpe2e20211220.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

USPTO: Public Views on Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property

Policy, Ekim 2020, https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/docu

ments/USPTO_AI-Report_2020-10-07.pdf adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Kaynakça 147

Vertinsky, L.: Thinking Machines and Patent Law (Eserin kendisi Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies

eserinde yer almakla beraber bu tezde kullanılan metin eserin yazarı

tarafından e-postayla iletilmiştir.)

Vertinsky, L./Rice, T. M.: Thinking About Thinking Machines: Implications of Machine Inventors For Patent Law, Boston University Journal of Science&Technology Law, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2002, s. 574-613.

Visagie, P.: South African Patent Office’s Recent Grant of A Patent For

An Invention Created By Artificial Intelligence, 02.08.2021,

https://www.mondaq.com/southafrica/patent/1097814/south-africanpatent-office39s-recent-grant-of-a-patent-for-an-invention-createdby-artificial-intelligence adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Walters, M.: In-house intrigue over UK AI-inventor Guidelines, Managing Intellectual Property, 25.11.2019, https://www.managingip.

com/article/b1kbm26jr7271t/in-house-intrigue-over-uk-ai-inventorguidelines adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Weelahan, F./Fixler, D./Reddy, S./Keane, P.: Patentability of AIgenerated Inventions in Australia, 2021, https://corrs.com.au/

insights/patentability-of-ai-generated-inventions-in-australia#_ftn4

adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Weibel, B.: AI-Created Inventions- Digital Inventor ComputerImplemented Simulations-Digital Twin, WIPO, WIPO/IP/AI/GE/19,

https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=51767 adresinden ulaşılabilir.

Wilson, H. J./Daugherty, P.: İş birliğine Dayalı Zekâ, Dijital Dönüşüm: 

Yapay Zekâ, Harvard Business Review Press, Optimist Yayıncılık, 

İstanbul, 2020, s. 169-203.

WIPO: Administrative Revocation and Invalidation Mechanisms-United

Kingdom, https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/scp/en/revocation

_mechanisms/administrative_revocation/pdf/admin_revocation_uk.p

df adresinden ulaşılabilir.

WIPO: Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: An Interview 

with Francis Gurry, https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2018/

05/article_0001.html adresinden ulaşılabilir.

WIPO: Intellectual Property and Frontier Technologies, https://www.

wipo.int/about-ip/en/frontier_technologies/ adresinden ulaşılabilir.

148 Kaynakça

WIPO: Opposition and Administrative Revocation Mechanisms, https://

www.wipo.int/scp/en/revocation_mechanisms/ adresinden ulaşılabilir.

WIPO Secretariat: Revised Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy

and Artificial Intelligence, Mayıs 2020.

WIPO: WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property (IP) and Artificial 

Intelligence (AI), WIPO/IP/AI/2/GE/20/1, 2019.

Yılmaztekin, H. K.: Türk Fikri Haklar Hukuku Yapay Zekâ Tarafından 

Meydana Getirilen Eserleri Korumak İçin Hazır Mı?, Galatasaray 

Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 19, No. 2, Aralık 2020, s. 

1513-1586.

Yusufoğlu, F.: Patent Verilebilirlik Şartları, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 

2014.

KARARLAR

APO 2019363177, Stephan L. Thaler, 09.02.2021, APO 5.

EP 18 275 163, EPC, 27.01.2020.

GB1816909.4 ve GB1818161.0; BL O/741/19, UK IPO.

USPTO, Başvuru No. 16/524, 325, B. 29.07.2019, K. 20.01.2020.

ZA2021/03242, Patent Journal, Temmuz 2021.

Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas City, U.S. Supreme Court, 1966,

383 U.S. 1.

JMVB Enterprises Pty Ltd v. Camoflag Pty Ltd, Federal Court of Australia, 2006, 154 FCR 348.

Mohamad v. Palestinian Auth, Supreme Court of the United States, 566

U.S. 2012.

Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Nanshan District People’s Court, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, Yue 0305 Min Chu No. 14010 Civil Judgement, 2019.

Stephan Thaler v. Andrew Hirshfeld, Performing Functions and Duties of

the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al., United

States District Court for The Eastern District of Virginia,

02.09.2021.

Kaynakça 149

Stephan Thaler v. Comptoller General of Patents Trademarks and Designs, Court of Appeal (Civil Divison), A3/2020/1851, 21.09.2021,

EWCA Civ. 1374, 202.

Thaler v. Commissioner of Patents, Federal Court of Australia,

30.07.2021, FCA 879.

Thaler v. The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks,

CH-2019-000339, 21.09.2020, EWHC 2412.

Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc., United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 698 F.3d 1374, 1380, 20