Harmonising Role of The New York Convention

Yayınevi: Yetkin Yayınları
Yazar: Bihter KAYTAZ EKER
ISBN: 9786050507256
Stok Durumu: Stokta var
80,75 TL 95,00 TL

Adet

 
   0 yorum  |  Yorum Yap
Kitap Künyesi
Yazar Bihter KAYTAZ EKER
Baskı Tarihi 2020/12
Baskı Sayısı 1
Boyut 16x24 cm (Standart Kitap Boyu)
Cilt Karton kapak
Sayfa Sayısı 386

The United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“the New York Convention”), signed on 10 June 1958, has provided a unique legal framework for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and arbitration agreements. Having been adopted by 166 States at the time of this book, the NYC represents the most significant convention in the field. Being widely adopted around the world more than any other international documents, it is time to assess its meaning for international arbitration. The NYC has played miscellaneous roles since its birth, and this book aims to address such an assessment within the context of its harmonising role. It provides a specific lens to offer a clear and comprehensive picture of harmonising role of the New York Convention and where future research should focus.

Having celebrated its 60th anniversary in 2018, this book, putting the role and significance of the NYC in the right context, would serve to pay tribute to the creators of the NYC on the one hand, and on the other hand would gain more attention than ever to direct effort to the right sources for further development in the field.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS 7

INTRODUCTION 11

PART I: THE INTENDED EFFECT OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION AT THE TIME OF ITS BIRTH

INTRODUCTION 16

CHAPTER 1: HARMONISATION TOOLS  PRECEDING 

THE NYC 17

IntroductiBIBLIOGRAPHYon 17

1.1. Circumstances Setting the Stage for the Geneva Protocol and        the Geneva Convention 17

1.2. The Geneva Protocol and the Geneva Convention 23

1.3. Reactions to the Shortcomings of the Geneva Treaties 32

CHAPTER 2: THE OBJECTIVE AND IMPROVEMENTS OF 

THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 41

Introduction 41

2.1. Scope of application 45

2.2. Arbitration Agreements 50

2.2.1. The Validity of Arbitration Agreements 51

2.2.2. The Effect of Arbitration Agreements 54

2.3. Arbitral Awards 59

2.3.1. Procedure 59

2.3.2. Formalities for applications for enforcement and 

grounds for refusal 62

2.4. Relationship to other instruments 74

2.5. Other possible measures 76

CONCLUSION OF PART I 81

PART II: ACHIEVEMENTS AND LIMITATIONS OF 

THE NEW YORK CONVENTION

INTRODUCTION 84

CHAPTER 3: ACHIEVEMENT OF THE ORIGINAL OBJECTIVE 85

Introduction 85

3.1. Harmonisation of Arbitration Concepts Regarding 

Standards for Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements 96

3.1.1. Territorial scope of Article II 96

3.1.2. Harmonisation around the basic characteristics of 

the New York Convention’s regime on 

arbitration agreements 100

3.1.2.1. Presumptive validity of arbitration agreements 100

3.1.2.2. Exceptions 108

3.1.2.3. Obligation to refer parties to a valid 

arbitration agreement to arbitration 114

3.2. Harmonisation of Arbitration Concepts Regarding the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 117

3.2.1. Scope of application 117

3.2.2. Harmonisation of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the regime of the New York Convention 126

3.2.2.1. Presumptive obligation to recognise 

arbitral awards 127

3.2.2.1.1. Formalities under Article IV 127

3.2.2.1.2. Grounds for refusal 133

3.2.2.1.2.1. The term “binding” 139

3.2.2.1.2.2. The term “suspended” 144

3.2.2.1.2.3. The phrase “the competent authority of the country underthe law of which 

the award was made” 147

3.2.2.1.2.4. Arbitral subject matters 

and the public policy 

defence 154

3.2.2.2. No affirmative obligation to deny enforcement 164

3.2.2.3. Procedure 181

CHAPTER 4: HARMONISATION OF LEGISLATIONS BEYOND THE INTENTION OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 184

Introduction 184

4.1. The Effect of the New York Convention on 

the Model Law 186

4.1.1. Scope of Application 186

4.1.2. Relationship between Arbitration and Courts 188

4.1.2.1. Circumstances for court involvement 

if the place of arbitration is in the country 

of the court 190

4.1.2.2. Circumstances for court involvement 

irrespective of where the place of arbitration is 195

4.1.3. The Conduct of Arbitration Proceedings 204

4.1.4. The 2006 Amendment 207

4.2. The Effect of the New York Convention on Legislative 

Revisions in Model Law Countries 209

4.3. The Effect of the New York Convention on Legislative 

Revisions in non-Model Law Countries 216

4.3.1. France 216

4.3.2. Switzerland 221

4.3.3. England 222

4.3.4. Sweden 230

CHAPTER 5: RELEVANCE OF THE NYC TO FURTHER HARMONISATION REGARDING ISSUES AFFECTING THE EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND 

THE CIRCULATION OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 231

Introduction 231

5.1. Limitations in Relation to the Scope of Application 231

5.2. Arbitration Agreement and Enforcement of Interim Measures 234

5.2.1. Reached limits with the launch of the UNCITRAL 235

5.2.2. The standard of review of arbitration agreements 

in pre-award stage 236

5.3. A dilemma emerging with the trend of concluding 

multi-tiered dispute resolution clause 245

5.4. Inadequacies of the Actual Execution System 252

5.5. Enforcement of Annulled Awards 257

5.5.1. Overview of approaches regarding the enforcement

of annulled arbitral awards 258

5.5.1.1. Germany 258

5.5.1.2. The Netherlands 260

5.5.1.3. United Kingdom 263

5.5.1.4. United States 264

5.5.1.5. France 271

5.5.1.6. Evaluations of approaches adopted by courts 

in different jurisdictions 277

5.5.2. Is there a future role for the New York Convention? 281

5.6. Looking to the Future: What may be the Next? 283

5.6.1. Calls for a New Convention and Reactions 284

5.6.2. Some Suggestions for Further Harmonisation 291

CONCLUSION OF PART II 297

BIBLIOGRAPHY 303

Official Documents 303

Court Decisions 310

Legislations 353

Books and Articles 355

Electronic Sources 368

Annex 1: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (The New York Convention) 371

Annex 2: The Geneva Convention on the Execution of Foreign 

Arbitral Awards of 1927 379

Annex 3: The Geneva Protocol on Arbitration Clauses of 1923 384


Documents are listed chronologically

The Committee on International Commercial Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, Report and Preliminary Draft Convention, adopted at the meeting of 13 March 1953, originally published in 1953 as ICC Publication No. 174, which is no longer available for distribution, pp. 10-12. It is reproduced in ‘Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards’, the ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol. 9/No.1-May 1998.

Resolution 520(VII) of the Economic and Social Council (17th Session), 6 April 1954.

United Nations Economic and Social Council, Resolution 570(XIX)-Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards, 853rd Plenary Meeting, 20 May 1955.

Report of the Committee on the Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards, nineteenth session, item 14, UN DOC E/2704, E/AC.42/4/Rev.1, 28 March 1955. 

Draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UN DOC E/2704, E/AC.42/4/Rev.1, 28 March 1955, Annex.

Report by the Secretary-General, UN DOC E/2822, twenty-first session, item 8, 31 January 1956. 

Comments by Governments and Organisations on the Draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UN DOC E/2822 Add.1-6, UN DOC E/2822/Corr.1 and UN DOC E/Conf. 26/3 and Add.1 (February 1956-March 1958).

Consideration of Other Measures for Increasing the Effectiveness of Arbitration in the Settlement of Private Law Disputes, Note by the Secretary-General, UN DOC E/CONF.26/6, 1 May 1957.

Provisional Agenda (New York, 20 May 1958), E/CONF.26/1 (20 September 1957).

Comments on Draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Note by the Secretary-General, 6 March 1958, UN DOC E/CONF. 26/2.

The Amendments to the Draft Convention Submitted by Governmental Delegations, the Reports of the Working Parties and the Text of Articles Adopted by the Conference, UN DOC E/CONF.26/7 and UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.7-63(21 May-9 June 1958).

Amendments to Draft Convention submitted by the Polish Delegation, UN DOC E/CONF.26/7, 21 May 1958.

Belgium, Czechoslovakia, United Kingdom: additional provision to be included in the draft Convention, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.10/Rev.1, 26 May 1958.

Pakistan: amendment to the Draft Convention, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.16, 26 May 1958. 

Netherlands: Amendments to the Draft Convention, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.17, 26 May 1958. 

Israel: proposed definition of words “arbitral award”, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.18, 26 May 1958.

Report of Working Party No. 1 on article I, paragraph 1 and article II of the draft Convention (E/2704 and Corr.1), UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.42, 2 June 1958. 

Report of Working Party No. 1 on article I, paragraph 1 and article II of the draft Convention (E/2704 and Corr.1)-Corrigendum, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.42/Corr.1, 2 June 1958. 

Working Party No. 3-Text of Articles III, IV and V of the draft Convention proposed by the Working Party for Adoption of the Conference UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.43, 3 June 1958. 

Text of Articles III, IV and V of the draft Convention as adopted by the Conference at its 17th meeting, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.48, 4 June 1958.

Text of Article VI of the draft Convention as adopted by the Conference at its 18th meeting, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.50, 4 June 1958. 

Text of Additional Protocol on the Validity of Arbitration Agreements Submitted by the Working Party No. 2, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.52, 5 June 1958. 

Consideration of Other Measures for Increasing the Effectiveness of Arbitration in the Settlement of Private Law Disputes (Item 5 on the Agenda), Report of the Committee on Other Measures, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.60, 6 June 1958. 

Text of the Convention as Provisionally Approved by the Drafting Committee, UN DOC E/CONF.26/L.61, 6 June 1958.

Text of Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards as Approved by the Drafting Committee on 9 June 1958, UN DOC E/CONF.26/8.

Final Act and Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UN DOC E/CONF.26/8/Rev.1. 

The Summary Records of the United Nations Conference on International Commercial Arbitration, New York, 20 May- 10 June 1958, UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.1-25.

Summary Record of the First Meeting (New York, 20 May 1958), UN DOC E/C0NF.26/SR.1, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Third Meeting (New York, 21 May, 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.3, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Fourth Meeting (New York, 22 May, 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.4, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Fifth Meeting (New York, 22 May, 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.5, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Sixth Meeting (New York, 23 May 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.6, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Eighth Meeting (New York, 26 May 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.8, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Ninth Meeting (New York, 26 May 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.9, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Tenth Meeting (New York, 27 May 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.10, 12 September 1958.

Summary Record of the Eleventh Meeting (New York, 27 May 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.11, 12 September 1958.

Summary Record of the Twelfth Meeting (New York, 28 May 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.12, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Thirteenth Meeting (New York, 28 May 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.13, 12 September 1958.

Summary Record of the Fourteenth Meeting (New York, 29 May 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.14, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Fifteenth Meeting (New York, 2 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.15, 12 September 1958.

Summary Record of the Sixteenth Meeting (New York, 3 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.16, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Seventeenth Meeting (New York, 3 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.17, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Eighteenth Meeting (New York, 4 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.18, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Twenty-First Meeting (New York, 5 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF. 26/SR.21, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Twenty-Second Meeting (New York, 9 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.22, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Twenty-Third Meeting (New York, 9 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF. 26/SR.23, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Twenty-Forth Meeting (New York, 10 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.24, 12 September 1958. 

Summary Record of the Twenty-Fifth Meeting (New York, 10 June 1958), UN DOC E/CONF.26/SR.25, 12 September 1958.  

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2205 (XXI) of 17 December 1966- Establishment of the  United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.

Report of the Secretary General: Study on the Application and Interpretation of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (A/CN.9/168), 20 April 1979, Yearbook of the United Nations Commission  on International Trade, 1979, Vol. X, pp.101-108.

Note by the Secretariat: Further Work in respect of International Commercial Arbitration, A/CN.9/169 (11 May 1979), Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law 1979, Vol. X, Part Two, III, D, p. 109.

Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the Work of its twelfth session (Vienna 18-29 June 1979) (A/34/17), Official Records of the General Assembly, Thirty-fourth Session, Supplement No. 17, in Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 1979, Vol. X, pp.11-33.

Report of the Secretary-General: Possible features of a model law on international commercial arbitration, A/CN.9/207, 14 May 1981, Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 1981, Volume XII, pp.75-92.

Report of the Working Group on International Contract Practices on the Work of its Third Session, First Working Group Report, UNCITRAL Fifteenth Session, New York (26 July-6 August 1982), A/CN.9/216, 23 March 1982, pp.1-22. 

Report of the Working Group on International Contract Practices on the Work of Its Fourth Session, UNCITRAL Sixteenth Session, Vienna, 24 May-3 June 1983, A/CN.9/232, 10 November 1982, pp.1-35.

Report of the Working Group on International Contract Practices on the Work of its Fifth Session, UNCITRAL Sixteenth Session, Vienna, 24 May-3 June 1983, A/CN.9/233, 28 March 1983, pp.1-37.

The Report of the Working Group on International Contract Practices on the Work of its Sixth Session, UNCITRAL Seventeenth Session, Vienna (25 June-13 July 1984), A/CN.9/245, 22 September 1983, pp.1-49. 

Composite Draft Text of a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Some Comments and Suggestions for Consideration, A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.50 (16 December 1983), in Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law 1984, Vol. XV, pp.230-234. 

Report of the Working Group on the Work of its Seventh Session, UNCITRAL Seventeenth Session, New York, 25 June-13 July 1984, A/CN.9/246, 6 March 1984, pp.1-60. 

Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Territorial Scope of Application and Related Issues, A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.49, in Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 1984, Vol. XV, Part Two, pp.227-230.

Analytical Commentary on Draft Text of a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Eighteenth Session, Vienna (3-21 June 1985), A/CN.9/264 (25 March 1985).

312th Meeting, A/CN.9/SR.312 (6 June 1985), in Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 1985, Vol. XVI, pp.426-430. 

A/CN.9./SR.322 (13 June 1985). 

328th Meeting, A/CN.9/SR.328 (18 June 1985), in Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 1985, Vol. XVI, pp.490-492 

A/CN.9/SR.330 (19 June 1985).

Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the work of its eighteenth session (Vienna, 3-21 June 1985) (A/40/17), in Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 1985, Vol. XVI, Part One, A, pp.1-46. 

UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, UN DOC A/40/17 Annex I, Adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on 21 June 1985.

Explanatory Note by the UNCITRAL secretariat on the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, in UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, United Nations, 1994, pp.15-25.

International Commercial Arbitration: Possible future work in the area of international commercial arbitration, A/CN.9/460, (6 April 1999).

Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the work of its thirty-second session (17 May-4 June 1999), Supplement No. 17 (A/54/17).

Report of the Working Group on Arbitration on the work of its thirty-second session (Vienna, 20-31 March 2000), A/CN.9/468, (10 April 2000).

Settlement of commercial disputes-Preparation of uniform provisions on written form for arbitration agreements-Article II(2) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958), A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.139, (14 December 2005). 

Draft interpretative instruments regarding article II, paragraph (2), and article VII, paragraph (1), of the New York Convention, in Report of the Working Group on Arbitration and Conciliation on the work of its forty-fourth session (New York, 23-27 January 2006), A/CN.9/592, (27 February 2006).

Recommendation regarding the interpretation of article II, paragraph 2, and article VII, paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, done in New York, 10 June 1958, adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on 7 July 2006 at its thirty-ninth session, issued in Official Records of the General Assembly, Sixty-first Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/61/17), annex II. 

Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the work of its thirty-ninth session (19 June-7 July 2006), A/61/17.

Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on forty-first session (16 June-3 July 2008), A/63/17.

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, A/61/453, 18 December 2006.

UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006, Vienna, 2008.

Settlement of commercial disputes-Recommendation regarding the interpretation of article II, paragraph (2), and article VII, paragraph (1), of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (“New York Convention”)-Compilation of comments by Governments, A/CN.9/661, (6 May 2008).

A Guide to UNCITRAL: Basic Facts about the United Nations Commission on International Trade, United Nations, Vienna, 2013.

The United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts, adopted on 23 November 2005, entry into force on 1 March 2013.

Court Decisions

Australia

‘Australia No.1, Flakt Australia Ltd. V. Wilkens & Davies Construction Co. Ltd., Supreme Court of New South Wales, 5 September 1979’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.6 (Kluwer Law International 1981), pp.218-220.

‘Australia No.3, Elders CED Ltd. v. Dravo Corp., Supreme Court of New South Wales, Common Law Division, Not Indicated, 28 March 1984’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.480-483.

‘Australia No.11, Resort Condominiums International Inc. v. Ray Bolwell and Resort Condominiums, Pty. Ltd., Supreme Court of Queensland, 389, 29 October 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.20 (Kluwer Law International 1995), pp.628-650.

‘Australia No.33, Transpac Capital Pte Limited (Singapore) v. Anthony Buntoro (Australia), Supreme Court, New South Wales, 11373 of 2008, 7 July 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.349-353.

‘Australia No.40, William Hare UAE LLC (UAE) v. Aircraft Support Industries Pty Ltd (Australia), Supreme Court, New South Wales, 14 October 2014’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.40 (Kluwer Law International 2015), pp.363-366.

United Group Rail Services Limited v. Rail Corporation New South Wales (2009) NSWCA 177 (3 July 2009).

Austria

‘Austria No.2/E1, P.-A.G. v. V., Oberster Gerichtshof, 17 November 1971’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976) p.183.

‘Austria No.3, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Oberste Gerichtshof, 3, 11 June 1969’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.2 (Kluwer Law International 1977), pp.232.

‘Austria No.6, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Oberster Gerichtshof [Supreme Court], 21 February 1978’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.10 (Kluwer Law International 1985), pp.418-420.

‘Austria No.9, Seller v. Buyer, Oberster Gerichtshof [Supreme Court], Not indicated, 22 May 1991’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.521-523.

‘Austria No.13/E4, Buyer (Austria) v. Seller (Serbia and Montenegro), Oberster Gerichtshof[Supreme Court], 3Ob221/04b, 26 January 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.30 (Kluwer Law International 2005), pp.421-436.

‘Austria No.16, D SA (Spain) v. W GmbH (Austria), Oberster Gerichtshof [Supreme Court], 3Ob211/05h, 26 April 2006’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.259-265.

Belgium

‘Belgium No.7/E3, Societe Nationale pour la Recherche, le Transport et la Commercialisation des Hydrocarbures (Sonatrach) v. Ford, Bacon and Davis Inc., Tribunal de premiere instance [Court of First Instance] of Brussel, not indicated, 6 December 1988’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.15 (Kluwer Law International 1990), pp.370-377.

Belgium No.11, Inter-Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation v. Baque Arabe et Internationale d’Investissements, Cour de Cassation[Supreme Court], 5 June 1998 in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999), pp.603-614. 

Bermuda

‘Bermuda No.3, Sojuznefteexport ( SNE) v. Joc Oil Ltd., Court of Appeal of Bermuda, Not Indicated, 7 July 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.15 (Kluwer Law International 1990) pp.384-435.

Brazil

‘Brazil No.4, Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos Sociedad Anonima Commercial Industrial Financeira Inmobiliaria y Agropecuaria v. Moinho Paulista Ltda, Superior Tribunal de Justiça, Special Court, 17 May 2006 and 3 March 2007, SEC No. 866-EX’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.371-380.

‘Brazil No.6, Bouvery International S.A. v. Valex Exportadora de Café Ltda, Superior Tribunal de Justiça [Superior Court of Justice], SEC No. 839-EX, 16 May 2007’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.387-389.

‘Brazil No.20, First Brands do Brasil Ltda. et. al. v. STP-Petroplus Produtos Automotivos S/A PPA et al., Superior Court of Justice of Brazil, SEC No. 611-EX (2005/0055688-0), 23 November 2006’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.180-182.

Bulgaria

‘Bulgaria No.1, ECONERG Ltd. v. National Electricity Company AD, Supreme Court of Appeal, Civil Collegium, Fifth Civil Department, 356/99, 23 February 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.25 (Kluwer Law International 2000), pp.678-682. 


Canada

‘Canada No.18, Adamas Management & Service Inc. (British Virgin Islands) v. Aurado Energy Inc. (Canada), New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench, Trial Division, Judicial District of Saint John, Docket No. S/M/57/04, 28 July 2004’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.30 (Kluwer Law International 2005), pp.479-487.

‘Canada No.21, Trans-Pacific Shipping Co. v. Atlantic & Orient Shipping Corporation (BVI), Federal Court of Canada, Not indicated, 27 April 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.31 (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.601-610.

‘Canada No.32, Assam Company India Limited v. Canoro Resources Ltd., Supreme Court of British Columbia, Docket S127853, 7 March 2014’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.39 (Kluwer Law International 2014), pp.375-379.

‘CLOUT Case 179, The City of Prince George v. A.L. Sims & Sons Ltd., British Columbia Court of Appeal, 4 July 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.23 (Kluwer Law International 1998), pp.223-224. 

Cayman Islands

‘Cayman Islands No.1, The Republic of Gabon v. Swiss Oil Corporation, Grand Court, not indicated, 17 June 1988’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.14 (Kluwer Law International 1989), pp.621-626. 

‘Cayman Islands No.2, Imbar Maritima SA, Imro Maritima SA and others v. The Republic of Gabon, Grand Court, Georgetown, Not Indicated, 1 March 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.15 (Kluwer Law International 1990), pp.436-442.

Chile

‘Chile No.1, Max Mauro Stubrin (Argentina), Walter Gerardo Stubrin (Argentina) and others v. Inversiones Morice S.A. (Chile), Corte Suprema [Supreme Court], First Chamber, Not indicated, 11 January 2007’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.473-477.


Colombia

‘Colombia No.3, Merck & Co., Merck Frosst Canada Inc., Frosst Laboratories Inc. v. Tecnoquímicas SA, Corte Suprema de Justicia, 26 January 1999 and 1 March 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.26 (Kluwer Law International 2001) pp.755-766.

‘Colombia No.6, Pollux Marine Services Corp. v. Colfletar Ltda, Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia, 12 May 2011’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.198-199.

‘Colombia No.7, Petrotesting Colombia S.A. et al. V. Ross Energy S.A., Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia, 11001-0203-000-2007-01956-00, 27 July 2011’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.200-204. 

‘Colombia No.8, Drummond Ltd. v. Instituto Nacional de Concesiones-INCO et al., Corte Suprema de Justicia, Civil Cassation Chamber, 19 December 2011 and 3 May 2012’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.205-209.

Czech Republic

‘Czech Republic No.2, F&G.A S.R. v. K, s.p., Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic, Case No. 21 Cdo 1511/2000, 29 March 2001’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.38 (Kluwer Law International 2013), pp.363-364.

France

‘France No.1, Compagnie de Saint Gobain-Pont a Mousson v. The Fertilizer Corporation of India LTD., President Tribunal De Grande Instance De Paris, not indicated, 15 May 1970’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), pp.184-185.

‘France No.2, Animalfeeds International Corporation v. S.A.A. Becker et Cie, Tribunal De Grande Instance De Strasbourg, not Indicated, 9 October 1970’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.2 (Kluwer Law International 1977), p.244.

‘France No.7/E1, Pabalk Ticaret Ltd. Sirketi (Turkey) v. Norsolor SA (France), Cour de Cassation, 9 October 1984 and Cour d’Appel, Paris, 19 November 1982’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.484-491. 

‘France No.8/E2, Société Européenne d'Etudes et d'Entreprises (SEEE) by its liquidator Mme. Y. Cleja v. Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank) and others, Cour d'appel [Court of Appeal] (1st and 2nd Civil Chambers) of Rouen, Not Indicated, 13 November 1984’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.491-499.

‘France No.12, Bomar Oil N.V. v. Entreprise Tunisienne d'Activités Pétrolières - ETAP, Cour d'appel [Court of Appeal] of Paris, Not Indicated, 20 January 1987’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.13 (Kluwer Law International 1988), pp.466-470.

‘France No.18, Hilmarton Ltd. v. Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation-OTV, Cour d'appel [Court of Appeal], Paris, 90-16778, 19 December 1991’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994), pp.655-657.

‘France No.23, Hilmarton Ltd. v. Omnium de traitement et de valorisation-OTV, Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court], Not Indicated, 23 March 1994’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.20 (Kluwer Law International 1995), pp.663-665.

‘France No.24, Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation-OTV v. Hilmarton, Cour d'Appel [Court of Appeal], Versailles, 315; 316, 29 June 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.524-531.

‘France No.25, Ministry of Public Works v. Societe Bec Freres, Cour d’Appel[Court of Appeal], Paris, Not indicated, 24 February 1994’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.682-690.

‘France No.26, The Arab Republic of Egypt v. Chromalloy Aeroservices, Inc., Cour d'Appel [Court of Appeal], Paris, Not Indicated, 14 January 1997’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.691-695.

‘France No.27, Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation (OTV) v. Hilmarton, Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court], Not Indicated, 10 June 1997’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.696-698. 

‘France No.34, American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) (US) v. Copropriété Maritime Jules Verne (France), Cour d'Appel [Court of Appeal], Paris, 126, 4 December 2002’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.657-662.

‘France No.39, Copropriété Maritime Jules Verne (France), et al. v. ABS-American Bureau of Shipping (US), Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court], First Civil Chamber, Appeal No. T 03-12.034, 7 June 2006’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.290-293.

‘France No. 40, Groupama Transport (France) v. MS Regine Hans und Klaus Heinrich KG (Germany), Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court], First Civil Chamber, Appeal No. 05-21818, 21 November 2006’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.294-296.

‘France No.41, S.A. Lesbats et Fils (France) v. Dr. Volker Grub (Germany), Cour d'Appel [Court of Appeal], Paris, 05/10887, 18 January 2007’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.297-298. 

‘France No.42, PT Putrabali Adyamulia (Indonesia) v. Rena Holding, et al., Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court], First Civil Chamber, Not Indicated, 29 June 2007’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.299-302.

‘France No. 43, HGL sas (France) v. Spanghero SA (France), Horizon Meats New Zealand Ltd (New Zealand), v. Blue Sky Marketing Ltd (New Zealand), Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court], First Civil Chamber, 10 F-D, 9 January 2008’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.478-479.

‘France No.47, Cytec Industries BV (Netherlands) v. SNF sas (France), Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court], First Civil Chamber, Appeal No. 06-15320, 4 June 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.489-494. 

‘France No. 59, Weissberg srl v. Subway International BV, Cour de Cassation, 24 February 2016’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol. 41 (Kluwer Law International 2016), pp. 463-464.

‘Hilmarton Ltd. v. Omnium de traitement et de valorisation-OTV, Tribunal de Grande Instance [Court of First Instance], Nanterre, Not Indicated, 22 September 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.20 (Kluwer Law International 1995), pp.194-197.

Maximov v. Novolipetsky Steel Mill, Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris, May 16, 2012.

Germany

‘Germany No.3, French seller v. German(F.R.) buyer, Landgericht Bremen, Not indicated, 8 June 1967’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.2 (Kluwer Law International 1977), p.234.

‘Germany No.8/E2, Dutch seller v. German (F.R.) buyer, Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, Not indicated, 8 Novmber 1971’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.2 (Kluwer Law International 1977), pp.237-238.

‘Germany No.11, Firm P v. Firm F, Oberlandesgericht Hamburg, Not indicated, 3 April 1975’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.2 (Kluwer Law International 1977), p.241.

‘Germany No.14, Danish buyer v. German (F.R.) seller, Oberlandesgericht Köln, 10 June 1976’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.258-260. 

‘Germany No.19, German (F.R.) seller v. German (F.R.) buyer, Landgericht Munich, 20 June 1978’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.5 (Kluwer Law International 1980), pp.260-262.

‘Germany No.28, Portuguese Company A v. Trustee in bankruptcy of German Company X, Landgericht [Court of First Instance] of Bremen, 20 January 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.12 (Kluwer Law International, 1987), p.486.

‘Germany No.30, German(F.R.) charterer v. Romanian shipowner, Bundesgerichshof [Federal Supreme Court], Not indicated, 15 May 1986’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.12 (Kluwer Law International 1987), pp.489-491.

‘Germany No.32, Parties not indicated, Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal] of Hamm, not indicated, 2 November 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.14 (Kluwer Law International 1989), pp.629-633. 

‘Germany No.33, SpA Ghezzi v. Jacob Boss Söhne, Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Supreme Court], Not indicated, 14 April 1988’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.15(Kluwer Law International 1990), pp.450-454.

‘Germany No.36, Seller of soybean flour v. Buyer of soybean flour, Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal] Hamburg, Not indicated, 26 January 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992), pp.491-499.

‘Germany No.38, Seller v. Buyer, Bundesgerichtshof[Federal Supreme Court], III ZR 269/8838., 18 January 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992), pp.503-509.

‘Germany No.42, Buyer v. Seller, Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Supreme Court], III ZR 30/9142, 3 December 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.20 (Kluwer Law International 1995), pp.666-670.

‘Germany No.50, Shipowner v. Time charterer, Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Hamburg, 30 July 1998’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.25 (Kluwer Law International 2000), pp.641-1164.

‘Germany No.51, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Rostock, 28 October 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.25 (Kluwer Law International 2000) pp.717-720.

‘Germany No.52, Investor v. Republic of Poland, Bundesgerichtshof [Supreme Court], 17 August 2000’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.26 (Kluwer Law International 2001), pp.771-773.

‘Germany No.53, Seller v. Buyer, Bayern Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal of Bavaria], 4Z Sch 50/99, 16 March 2000’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.27 (Kluwer Law International, 2002), pp.445-450.

‘Germany No.59, Seller v. Buyer (Germany), Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Brandenburg, 8 Sch 01/99, 2 September 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004) pp.697-699.

‘Germany No.60, Dutch Shipowner v. German Cattle and Meat Dealer, Oberlandesgericht, Stuttgart, 18 October 1999 and Bundesgerichtshof, 1 February 2001’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.700-714.

‘Germany No.62, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Cologne, 9Sch 04/00, 13 November 2000’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.722-723.

‘Germany No.63, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Supreme Court], III ZB 71/99, 22 February 2001’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.724-728.

‘Germany No.67, Forwarding agent v. Dealer, Brandenburgisches Oberlandesgericht [Brandenburg Court of Appeal], 8 Sch 2/01, 13 June 2002’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004) pp.747-753.

‘Germany No.68, Film distributor v. Film producer, Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht [Higher Court of Appeal of Bavaria], 4 Z Sch 13/02, 22 November 2002’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.754-760.

‘Germany No.80, Trading company (Israel) v. Buyer (Germany), Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Cologne, 9 Sch 01-03, 23 April 2004’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.30 (Kluwer Law International 2005), pp.557-562.

‘Germany No.82/E16, K Trading Company (Syria) v. Bayerischen Motoren Werke AG (Germany), Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht [Higher Court of Appeal of Baveria], 4Z Sch 005-04, 23 September 2004’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.30 (Kluwer Law International 2005), pp.568-573.

‘Germany No.85/E17, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Schleswig, 85, 30 March 2000’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.31 (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.652-662.

‘Germany No.86, Not indicated v. Not indicated, [Court of Appeal], Düsseldorf, 86, 19 January 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.31 (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.663-670.

‘Germany No.98, Licensee v. Licensor, Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Düsseldorf, IV Sch (Kart) 01/02, 21 July 2004’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.315-321.

‘Germany No.101, Not indicated v. Not indicated ,Oberlandesgericht[Court of Appeal], Karlsruhe, 9 Sch 02/05, 26 March 2006’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.342-346. 

‘Germany No.109, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Supreme Court], III ZB 35/06, 18 January 2007’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33, (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.506-509.

‘Germany No.114, Creditor under the award (Taiwan) v. Debtor under the award (Germany), Oberlandesgericht[Court of Appeal], Kalsruhe, 9 Sch 02/07, 14 September 2007’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.541-548.

‘Germany No.117/E19, Manufacturer(Ukraine) v. Supplier, in liquidation(Germany), Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Munich, 34 Sch 06/05, 15 March 2006’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009), pp.499-503.

‘Germany No.119, Buyer(Ukraine) v. Supplier(Germany), Kammergericht[Court of Appeal], Berlin, 20 Sch 02/08, 17 April 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009), pp.510-515. 

‘Germany No.126/E21, Clothing manufacturer (Ukraine) v. Textiles manufacturer (Germany), Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Munich, 34 Sch 04/08, 19 January 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010), pp.362-364.

‘Germany No.134, Seller (Sweden) v. Buyer (Germany), Oberlandesgericht [Court of Appeal], Munich, 34 Sch 20/08, 12 October 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010), pp.383-385.

‘Germany No.150, Ukrainian dealer v. German manufacturer, Oberlandesgericht, Munich, 30 July 2012 and Bundesgerichtshof, 23 April 2013’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.39 (Kluwer Law International 2014) pp.394-398. 

Ghana

‘Ghana No.1, Strojexport v. Edward Nasser and Company (Motors), Limited, Hight Court of Ghana, Not indicated, 29 September 1965’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.3 (Kluwer Law International 1978), p.276.

Greece

‘Greece No.2, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Court of Appeal of Athens, 2768, 1972’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.186.

‘Greece No.3, Not Indicated v. Not Indicated, Supreme Court (Areios Pagos), 926, 1973’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1, (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.186.

‘Greece No.4, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Court of Appeal of Patras, 469, 1974’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.187.

‘Greece No.5, Agrimpex S.A. v. J.F.Braun & Sons, Inc., Areios Pagos (Supreme Court), 88/1977, 14 January 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), p.269.

‘Greece No.6, Charterer v. shipowner, Court of First Instance of Athens, 3359, 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.500-501.

‘Greece No.10, Greek Company v. FR German Company, Court of Appeal of Athens, 4458, 1984’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.14 (Kluwer Law International 1989), pp.638-639.

‘Greece No.17, Company X(Albania) v. Republic of Z, Monomeles Protodikio [Court of First Instance, Single Judge], Athens, Decision no. 1741 of 2007, 2007’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.563-564.

Hong Kong

‘Apex Tech Investment Limited v. Chuang’s Development (China) Limited, Court of Appeal, 15 March 1996’, available at http://2007.cnarb.com/algy/zgfyzcal/hk/b1997/201102/16637.html (accessed on 29 October 2015).

‘Hong Kong No.2, Shenzhen Nan Da Industrial v. Trade United Company Limited, Supreme Court of Hong Kong, High Court, MP 12492, 2 March 1991’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.18 (Kluwer Law International 1993), pp.377-384.

‘Hong Kong No.3, Guangdong New Technology Import & Export Corporation Jiangmen Branch v. Chiu Shing trading as B.C. Property & Trading Company, Supreme Court of Hong Kong, High Court, MP 16253., 23 August 1991’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.18 (Kluwer Law International 1993), pp.385-388.

‘Hong Kong No.5, J.J. Agro Industries(P) Ltd. v. Texuna International Ltd., Supreme Court of Hong Kong, High Court, MP 7515., 12 August 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.18 (Kluwer Law International 1993), pp.396-402.

‘Hong Kong No.6, Paklito Investment Limited v. Klockner East Asia Limited, Supreme Court of Hong Kong, High Court, MP 2219, 15 January 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994), pp.664-674.

‘Hong Kong No.7, Quinhuangdao Tongda Enterprise Development Company, et al. v. Million Basic Company Limited, Supreme Court of Hong Kong, High Court, MP 1150, 5 January 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994), pp.675-679. 

‘Hong Kong No.8, China Nanhai Oil Joint Service Corporation Shenzhen Branch v. Gee Tai Holdings Co. Ltd., Supreme Court of Hong Kong, High Court, MP 24118, 13 July 1994’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.20 (Kluwer Law International 1995), pp.671-680.

‘Hong Kong No.9, Nanjing Cereals, Oils Foodstuffs Import & Export Corporation v. Luckmate Commodities Trading Ltd., Supreme Court of Hong Kong, High Court, MP 1167, 16 December 1994’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.542-545.

‘Hong Kong No.15, Hebei Import & Export Corporation v. Polytek Engineering Company Limited, Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 10 of 1998, 9 February 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999), pp.652-677. 

‘Hong Kong No.16, Medison Co., Ltd v. Victor (Far East) Limited, High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance, 8 April 2000’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.26 (Kluwer Law International 2001), pp.774-779.

India

‘India No.3, Food Corporation of India v. Mardestine Compania Naviera, High Court of Kerala, 1 January 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.270-271.

‘India No.10, Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Company, International Chamber of Commerce, Supreme Court, 16 August 1984’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.10 (Kluwer Law International 1985), pp.431-449.

‘India No.11, COSID Inc. Steel Authority of India Ltd., High Court of Delhi, Not indicated, 12 July 1985’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.502-507.

‘India No.16, Orient Middle East Lines Ltd., M/s Brace Transport Corporation of Monrovia and another, High Court of Gujarat, Not Indicated, 19 April 1985’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.14, (Kluwer Law International 1989), pp.648-663.

‘India No.19, Renusagar Power Company v. General Electric Company, High Court, Bombay, Not Indicated, 12 October 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.16 (Kluwer Law International 1991), pp.553-573.

‘India No.21, National Thermal Power Corporation v. the Singer Company, and Others, Supreme Court 1978, 7 May 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.18 (Kluwer Law International 1993), pp.403-414. 

‘India No.22, Renusagar Power Co. Ltd v. General Electric Co., Supreme Court of India, Not indicated, 7 October 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.20 (Kluwer Law International 1995), pp.681-738.

‘India No.26, Gas Authority of India, Ltd. v. SPIE-CAPAG, S.A. and others, Delhi High Court, Suit No. 1440; I.A. No. 5206, 15 October 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.23 (Kluwer Law International 1998), pp.688-712.

‘India No.40, International Investor KCSC v. Sanghi Polyesters Ltd., High Court, Andhra Pradesh, Civil Revision Petition No. 331 of 2002; Civil Revision Petition No. 1441 of 2002, 9 September 2002’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.30 (Kluwer Law International 2005), pp.557-590.

‘India No.44, Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. M/V AFRICAN TRADER, High Court, Gujarat, Not Indicated, 7 February 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010) pp.398-400.

‘India No.48, Bharat Aluminium Co. et al. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. et al., Supreme Court of India, 6 September 2012’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37, (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.244-249.

‘Videocon Industries Limited v. JMC Projects (India) Limited, Bombay High Court, 9 January 2013’, available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/32464070/ (accessed on 6 November 2016).

Israel

‘Israel No.3, Zeevi Holdings Ltd. (in receivership) (Israel) v. The Republic of Bulgaria, District Court, Jerusalem, HP (Jer) 6203/07, 13 January 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009), pp.632-636.

‘Israel No.4, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Israel) v. Proneuron Biotechnologies, Inc. and others, Oberster Gerichtshof [Supreme Court], FH 8511/09, 24 January 2010’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010) pp.407-408.

Italy

 ‘Italy No.5/E1, Ditta Augusto Miserocchi v. S.p.a. Paolo Agnesi, Corte Di Cassazione (Sezioni Unite), 3620, 13 December 1971’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA 1976, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976) p.190.

‘Italy No.6, Pezzota Camillo v. S.a.s. C.I.P.R.A. di Schmutz & C., Tribunale Di Milano, 11 December 1972’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol. 1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.190.

‘Italy No.10, Cantiere Navale Leopold Rodriguez v. Supramar A.G., Corte di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite [Supreme Court, Plenary Session], 2969, 10 November 1973’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1076), p.192.

‘Italy No.11, Ditte Frey, Milota and others v. Ditte F. Cuccaro e figli, Corte D’Appello Di Napoli, 13 December 1974’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1, (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.193.

‘Italy No.12, S.a.S. C.I.P.R.A. di Schmutz & C. v. Pezzota Camillo, Corte D'Appello Di Milano, Not Indicated, 13 December 1974’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.2 (Kluwer Law International 1977) p.246.

‘Italy No.18/E3, S.A. Tradax Export v. S.p.a. Carapelli, Corte di Appello di Firenze, 22 October 1976’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.3 (Kluwer Law International 1978), pp.279-280. 

‘Italy No.22, Societa La Naviera Grancebaco S.A. v. Ditta Italgrani, Tribunale Di Napoli, 30 June 1976’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4, (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.277-279. 

‘Italy No.29, Bobbie Brooks Inc. v. Lanificio Walter Banci s.a.s., Corte Di Appello Di Firenze, 8 October 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.289-291. 

‘Italy No.34, S.a.S. Wieland K.G. v. Societa Industriale Meridionale (S.I.M.), Court of Appeal of Messina, 19 May 1976’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.5, (Kluwer Law International 1980), p.266.

‘Italy No.38, Soc. An. di Assicuriazioni e Riassicurazioni 'Lloyd Continental' v. S.p.A. Navigazione Alga, Corte di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite [Supreme Court, Plenary Session], 4746, 11 September 1979’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.6 (Kluwer Law International 1981), pp.230-231. 

‘Italy No.46, Getreide Import Gesellschaft mbH (FR Germany) v. Fratelli Casillo (Italy), Corte di Cassazione, 7 October 1980, No. 5378 and Corte di Appello, Bari, 28 November 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.7 (Kluwer Law International 1982) pp.342-344.

‘Italy No.47, Vicere Livio v. Prodexport, Corte Di Cassazione (Sez. I), 3456, 26 May 1981’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.7 (Kluwer Law International 1982), pp.345-346.

‘Italy No.51/E5, Efxinos Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Rawi Shipping Lines Ltd., Corte Di Appello of Genova, 2 May 1980’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.8 (Kluwer Law International 1983), pp.381-382.

‘Italy No.52, Societe Italo-Belge pour le Commerce et I’Industrie v. S.p.a. I.G.O.R., Corte Di Appello of Brescia, 27 December 1980’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.8 (Kluwer Law International 1983), pp.383-385.

‘Italy No.54/E6, H. & H. Hackenberg G.m.b.H. v. Nino Pizza, Corte Di Appello of Ancona, 8 June 1981’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.8 (Kluwer Law International 1983) p.389.

‘Italy No.58, La Ligna v. Antonio Battiti, Battiti Antonio & C. And others, Corte di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite [Supreme Court, Plenary Session], 836, 11 February 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984), pp.421-422.

‘Italy No.59, Fratelli Variola S.p.A. v. Danaos Shipping Company (Panama), Corte di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite [Supreme Court, Plenary Session], 563, 28 January 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984), pp.423-425.

‘Italy No.60, Fratelli Variola S.p.A. v. Kampffmeijer S.a. r.l, Corte di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite [Supreme Court, Plenary Session], 1727, 17 March 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984), p.426.

‘Italy No.61, S.I.A.G.A. (Società Italiana Articoli Grafici Affini) S.p.A. v. Solna Offset AB Printing Equipment, Fallimento Stabilimento Poligrafico C. Colombi S.p.A., Corte di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite [Supreme Court, Plenary Session], 124, 12 January 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984), pp.427-428.

‘Italy No.63, Air India v. Carlo Avanzo, Corte di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite [Supreme Court, Plenary Session], 5244, 12 October 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984), p.431.

‘Italy No.73, Rocco Giuseppe e Figli s.n.c. v. Agenzia Marittima Constantino Tomasos Ltd., agent for Armadora San Francisco S.A. (Panama) and for its vessel Lagos Erie, Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], Sez. I, 7033, 20 December 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.10 (Kluwer Law International 1985), pp.466-467.

‘Italy No.79, Conceria Fratelli Tollio s.n.c. v. Ditta O.S. Blenkinsop, Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], 6925, 21 November 1983’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.10 (Kluwer Law International 1985) pp.478-479.

‘Italy No.88, Coltellerie Italiane Zoppis v. Arthur Salm Inc., Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], 4537, 30 July 1984’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986) pp.519-520.

‘Italy No.90, Cerealsarda di A. Casillo & Co. s.a.s. v. Ditta Otello Mantovani, Corte di Appello [Court of Appeal] of Venice, Not Indicated, 26 January 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.12 (Kluwer Law International 1987) p.493.

‘Italy No.95, Compañía Española de la Penicilina y Antibioticos SA v. Crinos Industria Farmacologica SpA, Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], 6339, 29 October 1986’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.13 (Kluwer Law International 1988) pp.509-511.

‘Italy No.101, Rocco Giuseppe e Figli snc v. Fossano Shipping Company Ltd., Tribunale [Court of First Instance] of Naples, Not Indicated, 22 February 1985’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.14 (Kluwer Law International 1989) pp.683-684.

‘Italy No.109, Jassica SA v. Ditta Gioacchino Polojaz, Corte di Cassazione, 12 February 1987, No. 1526 and Corte di Cassazione, 26 May 1987, No. 4706’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992), pp.525-528.

 ‘Italy No.112, Paolo Donati v. Lupalu (HK) Ltd, Tribunale [Court of First Instance], Milan, Not Indicated, 8 January 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992) pp.539-541.

‘Italy No.113, Della Sanara Kustvaart - Bevrachting & Overslagbedrijf BV v. Fallimento Cap. Giovanni Coppola srl, in liquidation, Corte di Appello [Court of Appeal], Genoa, Not Indicated, 3 February 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992) pp.542-544.

‘Italy No.114/E15, Vento & C snc v. E.D. & F. Man (Coffee) Limited, Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], Not Indicated, 8 August 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International, 1992), pp.545-550.

‘Italy No.127, S.r.l. Ditta Michele Tavella v. Palmco Oil Mill L.D.N. B.M.D., Office of the Public Prosecutor, Corte di Cassazione[Supreme Court], 12187, 12 November 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994), pp.692-693.

‘Italy No.130, Subcontractor v. Contractor, Corte di Appello [Court of Appeal (of Bologna)], Not indicated, 4 February 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994), pp.700-702.

‘Italy No.132, Finagrain Compagnie Commerciale Agricole et Financiere SA v. Patano snc, Corte di Appello [Court of Appeal], Bari, Not Indicated, 30 November 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.571-575.

‘Italy No.135, Lezina Shipping Co. SA v. Casillo Grani snc, Corte di Appello [Court of Appeal], Bari, Not indicated, 19 March 1991’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.585-586.

‘Italy No.143, Allsop Automatic Inc. v. Tecnoski snc, Corte di Appello[Court of Appeal], Milan, Not indicated, 4 December 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.725-726.

‘Italy No.144, WTB-Walter Thosti Boswau Bauaktiengesellschaft v. Costruire Coop. srl, Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], 6426, 7 June 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.727-733.

‘Italy No.150, srl Campomarzio Impianti v. Lampart Vegypary Gepgyar, Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], 9980, 20 September 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999), pp.698-702.

‘Italy No.156, Ortona Navi SpA v. Leonard J. Jacobs and Arleen L. Jacobs, Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], 9641, 10 September 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.26 (Kluwer Law International 2001), pp.812-815.

‘Italy No.178, Globtrade Italiana srl (Italy) v. East Point Trading Ltd (Cyprus), Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], First Civil Chamber, 24856, 8 October 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009), pp.644-648.

‘Italy No.182, Microware s.r.l. in liquidation (Italy) v. Indicia Diagnostic S.A., Corte di Cassazione [Supreme Court], First Civil Chamber, 17291, 23 July 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010), pp.418-419.

Japan

‘Japan No.1, Niroshi Nish v. Compagna di navigatione et commercio, Court of Appeal Tokyo (2nd Sect. Civ.), 14 March 1963’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.194.


Korea

‘Korea No.1, Hanyang Konyoung Co. Ltd. v. Mantovani O & C S.P.A., High Court of Seoul, Not Indicated, 9 March 1988’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992) pp.564-567.

‘Korea No.3, Adviso N.V. v. Korea Overseas Construction Corp., Supreme Court, 93Da53054, 14 February 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.612-616.

‘Korea No.4, Petitioner v. Respondent, Supreme Court of Korea, 2004DA20180, 10 December 2004’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.257-258. 

Liechtenstein

‘Liechtenstein No.1, Parties not indicated, Oberster Gerichtshof, 08 EX.2012.6905, 7 June 2013’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.39 (Kluwer Law International 2014), pp.434-436.

Lithuania

‘Lithuania No.3, L.B. v. State Property Fund of the Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Court of Lithuania, Civil Case No. 3K-3-363/2014, 27 June 2014’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.39 (Kluwer Law International 2014), pp.437-442.

Luxembourg

‘Luxembourg No.1, Kersa Holding Company Luxembourg v. Infancourtage, Famajuk Investment and Isny, Cour Superieure de Justice [Court of Appeal], Not Indicated, 24 November 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996) pp.617-626. 

‘Luxembourg No.2, Sovereign Participations International S.A. v. Chadmore Developments Ltd., Cour d’Appel [Court of Appeal], 28 January 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999), pp.714-723.

Malaysia

‘Malaysia No.2, Sri Lanka Cricket v. World Sport Nimbus Pte Ltd, Court of Appeal, Putrajaya, W-04-964-2004, 14 March 2006’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008) pp.607-612.

‘Malaysia No.4, Lombard Commodities Limited v. Alami Vegetable Oil Products SDN BHD (Malaysia), Federal Court of Malaysia, Civil Appeal No. 02(f)-37-2008(W), 3 November 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010) pp.420-422.

‘Malaysia No.5, Open Type Joint Stock Company Efirnoye-EFKO v. Alfa Trading Ltd, High Court of Kuala Lumpur, D-24NCC-221-2010, 10 October 2011’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.264-267.

Mexico

‘Mexico No.1, Presse Office S.A. v. Centro Editorial Hoy S.A., Tribunal Superior De Justicia, Eighteenth Civil Court of First Instance fort the Federal District of Mexico, 24 February 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.301-302.

‘Mexico No.2, Malden Mills Inc. v. Hilaturas Lourdes S.A., Tribunal Superior De Justicia, Court of Appeals (Fifth Chamber) For the Federal District of Mexico, 1 August 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.302-304.

Morocco

‘Morocco No.1, Office National du The et du Sucre v. Philippines Sugar Company Ltd., Court of Appeal, Casablanca, Not indicated, 21 June 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.627-631.

The Netherlands

‘Netherlands No.2D, Société Européenne d'Etudes et d'Enterprises (S.E.E.E.) v. Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Supreme Court (Hoge Raad), 7 November 1975’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976) pp.195-198.

‘Netherlands No.3, German (F.R.)  party v. Dutch party, President of Rechtbank, The Hague, 26 April 1973’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.305-306.

‘Netherlands No.4, a Rumanian State enterprise v. Dutch, President of Rechtbank, Amsterdam, 14 December 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.307-308.

‘Netherlands No.10, SPP (Middle East) Ltd. v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, President of the District Court of Amsterdam, 12 July 1984’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.10 (Kluwer Law International 1985), pp.487-489.

‘Netherlands No.15, Owerri Commercial Inc. v. Dielle Srl., Gerechtshof [Court of Appeal] The Hague, Not indicated, 4 August 1993’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994), pp.703-707.

‘Netherlands No.16, G.W.L. Kersten & Co. B.V. v. Societe Commeciale Raoul-Duval et Cie, Gerechtshof [Court of Appeal] Amsterdam, 16 July 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International, 1994), pp.708-709.

‘Netherlands No.25, China Packaging Design Corporation v. SCA Recycling Reukema Trading B.V.,” Arrondissementsrechtbank [Court of First Instance], Zutphen, 11 November 1998’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999), pp.724-726.

‘Netherlands No.31, Yukos Capital s.a.r.l. (Luxembourg) v. OAO Rosneft (Russian Federation), Gerechtshof [Court of Appeal], Amsterdam, 200,005,269, 28 April 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009) pp.703-714.

‘Netherlands No.32, LoJack Equipment Ireland Ltd. (Ireland) v. A, Voorzieningenrechter [President], Rechtbank [Court of First Instance], Amsterdam, 411230/KG RK 08-3652, 18 June 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009), pp.715-721.

‘Netherlands No.41, Nikolai Viktorovich Maximov v. OJSC Novolipetsky Metallurgichesky Kombinat, Provisions Judge of the District Court of Amsterdam, 491569/KG RK 11-1722, 17 November 2011’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012) pp.274-276. 

‘Netherlands No.43, Nova Shipping Ltd v. Med Marine Kilavuzluk ve Romarkaj Hizmetleri Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Provisions Judge of the District Court of Amsterdam, 505950/KG RK 11-3695, 26 July 2012’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.282-284.

Nigeria

‘Nigeria No.1, Murmansk State Steamship Line v. Kano Oil Millers Ltd., Supreme Court, 11 December 1974’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.7 (Kluwer Law International 1982), pp.349-350.

Norway

‘Norway No.1, Charterer v. Shipowner, Halogaland Court of Appeal, 16 August 1999 in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed)’, YCA, Vol.27 (Kluwer Law International 2002), pp.519-523.

‘Norway No.2, Pulsarr Industrial Research B.V. (Netherlands) v. Nils H. Nilsen A.S. (Norway), Enforcement Court, Vardo, 10 July 2002’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.28 (Kluwer Law International 2003), pp.821-828.

Pakistan

‘Pakistan No.1, Travel Automation Ltd. v. Abacus International Pvt. Ltd. and others, High Court, Karachi, Suit No. 1318 of 2004, 14 February 2006’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.438-448.

Peru

‘Peru No.3, Stemcor UK Limited v. Guiceve S.A.C., Corte Superior de Justicia, Lima, Case No. 878-2010, 28 April 2011’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.39 (Kluwer Law Arbitration 2014), pp.467-469.

Philippines

‘Philippines No.6, Ting Guan Trading Corp. v. Hon. Cesar D. Santamaria, as Presiding Judge and others, Court of Appeals, Manila, Thirteenth Division, CA-G.R. SP No. 92828, 5 July 2006’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33; (Kluwer Law International 2008) pp.646-649.

Poland

‘Poland No.1, E.T. Sp. z.o.o. v. T.M.D. GmbH et al., Sad Najwyszy, 6 November 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.36 (Kluwer Law International 2011), pp.310-312.

Portugal

‘Portugal No.2, S.A. (Belgium) v. B Sociedade Nacional, S.A., Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, Civil Section, 19 March 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.36 (Kluwer Law International 2011), pp.313-314.

‘Portugal No.7, AA, P.O. v. DD Lda, Tribunal da Relação, Porto, 9 September 2013 and Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 25 February 2014’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.39, (Kluwer Law International 2014), pp.474-476.

Romania

‘Romania No.2, Romanian Company v. Panamanian Company, Supreme Court, 1560, 3 June 1984’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.14, (Kluwer Law International 1989), pp.691-692.

Russia

‘Russian Federation No.5, Kotraco, Inc. v. V/O Rosvneshtorg, Moscow District Court (Civil Department), not indicated, 31 October 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.23 (Kluwer Law International 1998), pp.735-737.

‘Russian Federation No.16, Dana Feed A/S (Denmark) v. OOO Arctic Salmon (Russian Federation), Federal Arbitrazh Court, Northwestern District, A42-4747/04-13, 9 December 2004’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.658-665.

‘Russian Federation No.33, Ciments Français v. Holding Company Sibirskiy Cement OJSC, Arbitrazh Court, Kemerovskaya Region, 20 July 2011’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.36 (Kluwer Law International 2011), pp.325-328.

Singapore

International Research Corp PLC v Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. and another (2013) SGCA 55.

South Africa

‘South Africa No.6, Pierre Fattouche v. Mzilikazi Khumalo, High Court, South Gauteng, Johannesburg, Case No. 508/2012, 6 May 2014’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.39 (Kluwer Law International 2014), pp.498-500.

Spain

‘Spain No.2/E1, X S.A. v. Y, Tribunal Superior [Supreme Court], 8 October 1981’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.8 (Kluwer Law International 1983) pp.406, 407.

‘Spain No.6/E3, X S.A. v. Y, Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], Not indicated, 14 January 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.523-524.

‘Spain No.10, M. Compañia Naviera S.A. v. C. de C.E. S.A., Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], Not Indicated, 6 October 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986) p.530.

‘Spain No.11/E5, Fletamentos Maritimos S.A. v. Star Dispatch Shipping, Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], Not Indicated, 22 December 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986) p.531.

‘Spain No.26/E10, Ferrer Maritima Espanola SA v. T. Baglantzis and Others, Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], not indicated, 21 January 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International), pp.673-675.

‘Spain No.27, Sea Traders SA v. Participaciones, Proyectos y Estudios SA, Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], Not Indicated, 6 April 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.676-677.

‘Spain No.32/E15, Consmaremma-Consorzio tra produttori agricoli Societa Cooperativa a responsabilita limitata v. Hermanos Escot Madrid, SA,Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], 20 February 2001’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.26 (Kluwer Law International 2001), pp.858-862.

‘Spain No.37, Union de Cooperativas Agricolas Epis-Centre v. Aguicersa, SL, Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], 1678/199, 7 July 1998’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.27 (Kluwer Law International 2002), pp.546-550.

‘Spain No.38, Glencore Grain Limited (UK) v. Sociedad Iberica de Molturacion, S.A. (Spain), Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], 16508/2003, 14 January 2003’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.30 (Kluwer Law International 2005), pp.605-609.

‘Spain No.45, Centrotex, S.A. (Czech Republic) v. Agencia Gestora de Negocios, S.A. (Agensa)(Spain), Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], Civil Chamber, First Section, Not Indicated, 13 November 2001’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed) YCA, Vol.31, (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.834-845.

‘Spain No.46, Antilles Cement Corporation (Puerto Rico) v. Transficem(Spain), Tribunal Supreme[Supreme Court], Civil Chamber, First Section, Not indicated, 20 July 2004’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.31 (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.846-852.

‘Spain No.50, Union Generale de Cinema, SA (France) v. X Y Z Desarrollos, SA (Spain), Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], Civil Chamber, 3536 of 1998, 11 April 2000’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.525-531.

‘Spain No.56, Saroc, S.p.A. (Italy) v. Sahece, S.A. (Spain), Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], Civil Chamber, Plenary Session, 2065 of 2001, 4 March 2003’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.571-581.

‘Spain No.57, Satico Shipping Company Limited (Cyprus) v. Maderas Iglesias (Spain), Tribunal Supremo [Supreme Court], Civil Chamber, Plenary Session, 2009 of 2001, 1 April 2003’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.582-590.

‘Spain No.61, Pueblo Film Distribution Hungary KFT(Hungary) v. Laurenfilm SA(Spain), Tribunal Supremo[Supreme Court], Civil Chamber, 743 of 2003, 31 May 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.608-615.

‘Spain No.66/E24, Cardena de Tiendas Venezolanas SA-Cativen (Venezuela) v. GMR Asesores SL (Spain), Inmomercado and others, Audiencia Provincial [Court of Appeal], Madrid, 163/2009 (Section 10), 1 April 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010), pp.448-449.

‘Spain No.70, Ventus Aliance S.R.O. v. Respondent, Audiencia Provincial, First Section, Soria, 17 September 2010’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.36 (Kluwer Law International 2011), pp.332-333.

Sweden

‘Sweden No.1, AB Götaverken(Sweden) v. General National Maritime Transport Company (Libya), Supreme Court, 13 August 1979, No. SO 1462 and Svea Court of Appeal (5th Dept.), Stockholm, 13 December 1978’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.6 (Kluwer Law International 1981), pp.237-242.

‘Sweden No.2, Libyan American Oil Company (LIAMCO) v. Socialist Peoples Arab Republic of Libya (Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahirya), Svea Court of Appeal, 18 June 1980’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.7 (Kluwer Law International 1982), pp.359-362.

Switzerland

A. SA v. B. SA, Swiss Federal Supreme Court, 4A_124/2014, 7 July 2014, available at http://www.swissarbitrationdecisions.com/ sites/default/files/7%20juillet%202014%204A%20124%202014.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2020).

Fondation M. v. Banque X, Swiss Tribunal Fédéral, 29 April 1996, ATF 122 III 139.

‘Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation-OTV v. Hilmarton, Tribunal Fédéral [Supreme Court], 17 April 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol. 19 (Kluwer Law International 1994) pp.214-222.

‘Switzerland No.2, Commoditex S.A. v. Alexandria Commercial Co., Cour De Justice Civile, Geneve, 12 May 1967’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.199.

‘Switzerland No.5, Dutch seller v. Swiss buyer, Obergericht of Basle, 3 June 1971’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.309-310.

‘Switzerland No.7, Joseph Müller A.G. v. Sigval Bergesen, Tribunal Federal[Federal Supreme Court], 26 February 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984), pp.437-441.

‘Switzerland No.10, Chrome Resources S.A. v. Leopold Lazarus Ltd., Tribunal Federal [Supreme Court], not indicated, 8 February 1978’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International Arbitration 1986), pp.538-542.

‘Switzerland No.11, Carbomin S.A. v. Ekton Corporation, Cour de Justice [Court of Appeal] of the Canton Geneva, Not Indicated, 14 April 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.12 (Kluwer Law International 1987) pp.502-504.

‘Switzerland No.20, N.Z. v. I., Appellationsgericht [Court of Appeal], Basel-Stadt, Not Indicated, 27 February 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992) pp.581-583.

‘Switzerland No.21, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Handelsgericht [Commercial Court] Zurich, 21, 20 April 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992), pp.584-586.

‘Switzerland No.23, K.S. AG v. C.C. SA, Camera di Esecuzione e Fallimenti [Execution and Bankruptcy Chamber], Canton Tessin, Not indicated, 19 June 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.20 (Kluwer Law International 1995), pp.762-765.

‘Switzerland No.24, Fincantieri-Cantieri navali italiani SpA v. Oto Melara SpA, M. and others, Tribunal Federal[Supreme Court], Not indicated, 23 June 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.20 (Kluwer Law International 1995), pp.766-770.

‘Switzerland No.26, DIETF Ltd. v. RF AG, Obergericht [Court of Appeal], Basel-Land, Not Indicated, 5 July 1994’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.685-689.

‘Switzerland No.27, Compagnie de Navigation et Transports SA v. MSC-Mediterranean Shipping Company SA, Tribunal Fédéral [Supreme Court], Not Indicated, 16 January 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.690-698.

‘Switzerland No.28, Inter Maritime Managaement SA v. Russin & Vecchi, Tribunal Federal [Supreme Court], Not indicated, 9 January 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.789-799.

‘Switzerland No.29, Insurance Company v. Reinsurance Company, Tribunal Fédéral [Supreme Court], Not Indicated, 21 March 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.800-806.

‘Switzerland No.30, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Bezirksgericht [Court of First Instance], Affoltern am Albis, 30, 26 May 1994’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.23 (Kluwer Law International 1998), pp.754-763.

‘Switzerland No.32, Compañía Minera Condesa SA v. Compañía de Minas Buenaventura SA, BRGM-Pérou SAS (formerly La-Source, Compagnie Minière SAS) v. ICC Arbitral Tribunal, Bundesgerichtshof [Supreme Court], 19 December 1997’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999) pp.727-731.

‘Switzerland No.33, R SA v. A Ltd., Geneva, Cour de Justice [Court of Appeal], 15 April 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.26 (Kluwer Law International 2001), pp.863-868.

‘Switzerland No.35, Not indicated v. Not indicated, Obergericht [Court of Appeal], Zug, 27 February 1998’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.805-808.

‘Switzerland No.37, Italian party v. Swiss company, Bezirksgericht, Zurich, 14 February 2003 and Obergericht, Zurich, 17 July 2003’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.819-833.

‘Switzerland No.38, A SA (Switzerland) v. B Co Ltd (British Virgin Islands), C SA (Ecuador), Tribunal Federal [Federal Supreme Court], 8 December 2003’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.834-842.

‘Switzerland No.39, Buyer v. Seller, Tribunal Federal, Second Civil Chamber, 21 February 2005 and 3 January 2006’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.619-628.

‘Switzerland No.40, Compagnie X SA v. Federation Y, Tribunal Federal [Federal Supreme Court], First Civil Chamber, 4A_403/2008/ech, 9 December 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009), pp.810-816.

‘Switzerland No.42, X AG v. Y AS, Bundesgerichtshof, 4 October 2010’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.36 (Kluwer Law International 2011), pp.340-342.

‘Switzerland No.46, X SA v. Z LLC, Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 2nd Civil Law Chamber, 5A_754/2011, 2 July 2012’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012), pp.305-308.

X. GmbH v. Y. Sarl, 4A_46/2011, 16 May 2011, available at http://www.swissarbitrationdecisions.com/sites/default/files/16%20mai%202011%204A%2046%202011.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2020).

X. Ltd. v. Y. S.p.A., 4A_628/2015, 16 March 2016, available at  http://www.swissarbitrationdecisions.com/sites/default/files/16%20mars%202016%204A%20628%202015.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2020).

Ukraine

‘Ukraine No.1, National Joint Stock Company Naftogaz Ukrainy v. RosUkrEnergo AG, Court of Appeal, City of Kiev, 17 September 2010 and Supreme Court of Ukraine, 24 November 2010’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.36 (Kluwer Law International 2011), pp.349-352.

‘Ukraine No.5, Nibulon SA v. Nasinnia-Agrokhim, Limited Liability Company, Sribnyansky District Court, Chernihivska Region, Case No. 2521/930/2012, 24 January 2013 and Supreme Court of Ukraine, 12 March 2013’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.38 (Kluwer Law International, 2013), pp.476-478.

United Kingdom

Al-Naimi v. Islamic Press Agency [2000] 1 Lloyd's Rep 522.

Birse Construction Limited v. Saint David Limited [1999] BLR 194.

Cable & Wireless v. IBM, (2002) EWHC 2059 (Comm).

Courtney&Fairbarn v. Tolaini Brothers (Hotels) Ltd. (1975) 1 WLR 297.

Crowther and another v Rayment and another [2015] EWHC 427.

Emirates Trading Agency LLC v. Prime Mineral Exports Private Ltd, (2014) EWHC 2104 (Comm).

‘Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation & ors v. Yuri Privalov & ors, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Civil Division, Case No. 2006 2353 A3 QBCMF, 24 January 2007’, Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, (Comitê Brasileiro de Arbitragem CBAr & IOB 2007, Vol. IV Issue 13), pp.133-149.

Golden Ocean Group Limited v. Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi Tbk Ltd, Genuine Maritime Ltd [2013] EWHC 1240 (Comm).

Holloway v. Chancery Mead Limited (2007) EWHC 2495 TCC.

Man Enterprise Sal v Al-Waddan Hotel Ltd [2013] EWHC 2356.

Nigel Peter Albon v. Naza Motor Trading SDN BHD & ORS (No. 3), [2007] EWHC 665 (Ch).

Noble Denton Middle East v. Noble Denton International Ltd [2010] EWHC 2574 (Comm).

Silver Dry Bulk Co Ltd v. Homer Hulbert Maritime Co Ltd, [2017] EWHC 44 (Comm).

Sulamerica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA and others v. Enesa Engenharia SA and others (2012) EWCA Civ 638.

‘UK No.3, Associated Bulk Carriers Ltd. v. Koch Shipping Inc., Court of Appeal, 20 July 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), p.316.

‘UK No.4, Roussel-Uclaf v. G.D. Searle & Co. Ltd., G.D. Searle & Co., High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, 4 October 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.317-319.

‘UK No.5, Lonrho Ltd. v. Companhia do Pipeline Mocambique Rodesia Sarl, The Shell Petroleum Company Ltd. and others, High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, 31 January 1978’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.320-322.

‘UK No.6, The Mauritius Sugar Syndicate v. Tate & Lyle Refineries Ltd., Emcar Ltd. and others, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty Court), 12 December 1977’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.323-327.

‘UK No.9, The Government of Kuwait v. Sir Frederick S. Snow and Partners and Others, High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court), 19 February 1981’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.7 (Kluwer Law International 1982), pp.367-372.

‘UK No.12, Haendler & Natermann GmbH v. Mr. Janos Paczy, Court of Appeal, 3 December 1980’ in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984) pp.445-447.

‘UK No.14, The Government of Kuwait v. Sir Frederick Snow & Partners and Others, Court of Appeal, 17 March 1983’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984), pp.451-458.

‘UK No.15, Ellerine Bros. (Pty) Ltd. v. and another South Africa, Klinger, Court of Appeal, 23 March 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.10 (Kluwer Law International 1985), pp.496-498. 

‘UK No.22, Deutsche Schachtbau-und Tiefbohrgesellschaft mbH v. Ras Al Khaimah National Oil Co., Shell International Petroleum Co. Ltd., Court of Appeal, Not indicated, 24 March 1987’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.13 (Kluwer Law International 1988), pp.522-536.

‘UK No.26, NMB(UK) Ltd. v. Kondo Ltd., Minebea Co. Ltd. and others, Court of Appeal, Not indicated, 19 March 1987’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.14 (Kluwer Law International 1989), pp.731-736.

‘UK No.30, Gatoil International Inc. v. National Iranian Oil Company, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Not Indicated, 21 December 1988’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992), pp.587-593.

‘UK No.55, Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation S.A. v. Hilmarton, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court), 24 May 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999) pp.777-785.

‘UK No.60, Yukos Oil Company v. Dardana Limited, Court of Appeal, Civil Division, A3/2001/1029, 18 April 2002’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.27 (Kluwer Law International 2002), pp.570-592.

‘UK No.70, IPCO Nigeria Limited (Nigeria) v. Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (Nigeria), High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court), Not indicated, 27 April 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.31 (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.853-866.

‘UK No.77, Yuri Privalov and others v. Fiona Trust Holding Corporation and others; on appeal: Fili Shipping Company Limited (14th Claimant) and others v. Premium Nafta Products Limited (20th Defendant) and others, Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 24 January 2007 and House of Lords, 17 October 2007’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.32 (Kluwer Law International 2007), pp.654-682.

‘UK No.79, Gater Assets Limited v. NAK Naftogaz Ukrainiy, High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, 22 March 2007; Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 17 October 2007 and High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, 15 February 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33, (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.721-751.

‘UK No.82, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation v. IPCO(Nigeria) Limited, High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, 17 April 2008 and Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 21 October 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008), pp.788-802.

‘UK No.91, Continental Transfert Technique Limited v. the Federal Government of Nigeria, Attorney General of the Federation (of Nigeria) and others, High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court), 2008 Folio 1280, 30 March 2010’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010), pp.472-474.

‘UK No.94, Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. OJSC Rosneft Oil Company, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Civil Division, A3/2011/1790, 27 June 2012’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.37 (Kluwer Law International 2012) pp.312-316.

Wah&Anor v. Grant Thornton International (2012) EWHC 3198 (Ch).

Walford v. Miles (1992) 2 AC 128. 

USA

AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers, 475 U.S. 643, 649, 89 L.Ed.2d 648, 106 S.Ct. 1415 (1986).

BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, 572 US.25 (2014).

Fertilizer Corporation of India v. IDI Management Inc., United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D., 517 F. Supp. 948 (9 June 1981)=US No.39, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.7 (Kluwer Law International 1982), pp.382-392.

‘First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, et uxor and MK Investments, Inc., Supreme Court of the United States, 94-560, 22 May 1995’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997) pp.278-286.

Flour Enterprises, Inc v. Solutia Inc., 147 F. Supp. 2d 648 (S.D. Tex. 2001).

Fritz Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Company, 417 U.S. 506 (1974), United States Supreme Court, 17 June 1974=US No.4, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), pp.203-204.

HIM Portland, LLC v. Devito Builders, Inc., 317 F.3d 41 (1st Cir. 2003). 

Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 85 (U.S. S.Ct. 2002).

Imperial Ethiopian Government v. Baruch-Foster Corporation, 535 F.2d 334 (1976), United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 19 July 1976=US No.10, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.2 (Kluwer Law International 1977), p.251.

Iran Aircraft Indus. v. Avco Corp., 980 F.2d (2nd Circuit 1992), pp.141-148.

‘Karaha Bodas Co., L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appelle v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara; et. al., Defendants, Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara, Defendant-Appellant, 364 F. 3d 274, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 23 March 2004’, available at http://openjurist.org/364/f3d/274 (accessed on 2 July 2015).

Parsons & Whittemore Overseas Co. Inc. v. Societe Generale De I’lndustrie Du Papier (RAKTA), and Bank of America, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 508 F.2d 969 (23 December 1974), pp. 971-978= US No.7, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.205.

Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 395 (1967).

Red Hook Meat Corp v. Bogopa-Columbia, Inc, 31 Misc 3d 814 (NY Supreme Court 2011).

‘Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. Antonio Jackson, Supreme Court of the United States, 09-497, 21 June 2010’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.35 (Kluwer Law International 2010) pp. 621-624.

Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 583, n. 7, 4 L.Ed.2d 1409, 80 S.Ct. 1347 (1960).

Tobey v. County of Bristol, 3 Story 800, 23 F. Cas. 1313, No. 14,065 (C.C.D.Mass. May Term 1845).

 ‘US No.3, Copal Co. Ltd. (Japan) v. Fotochrome, Inc. (USA), United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, 6 June 1974 and United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed, 29 May 1975’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), pp.202-203.

‘US No.5, CEAT, S.p.A. v. McCreary Tire&Rubber Co., Mellon Bank N.A., United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit), 8 July 1974’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.1 (Kluwer Law International 1976), p.203.

‘US No.9, Antco Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Sidemar S.p.A., United States District Court, Southern District of New York, not indicated, 28 June 1976’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.2 (Kluwer Law International 1977), pp.251.

‘US No.24, Ipitrade International S.A. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 25 September 1978’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.4 (Kluwer Law International 1979), pp.337-338.

‘US No.50, M. Sylvain Ledee, et al. v. Ceramiche Ragno, et al., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 30 August 1982’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984), pp.471-473.

‘US No.51, Rhone Méditerranée Compagnia francese di assicurazioni e riassicurazioni (Italy) v. Achille Lauro et al. (Italy), United States District Court, Virgin Islands, District of St. Thomas and St. John, 4 October 1982 and United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 6 July 1983’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984) pp.474-482.

‘US No.54, Sigval Bergesen, as Owners of the M/T Sydfonn and others v. Joseph Müller A.G., United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 17 June 1983’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International 1984) pp.487-494.

‘US No.58, Shaheen Natural Resources Company, Inc. (USA) v. Societe Nationale pour la Recherche, la Production, le Transport, la Transformation et la Commercialisation des Hydrocarbures (Sonatrach) (Algeria), United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 15 November 1983 and United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 11 May 1984’, in Pieter Sanders(ed), YCA, Vol.10 (Kluwer Law International 1985), pp.540-547.

‘US No.59, Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., United States Supreme Court, Not indicated, 2 July 1985’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.555-565. 

‘US No.60, Gates Energy Products, Inc. v. Yuasa Battery Company, Ltd. and others, United States District Court, District of Colorado, Not Indicated, 9 September 1983’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.566-567.

‘US No.61, International Navigation Ltd. v. Waterside Ocean Navigation Co., Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Not Indicated, 18 June 1984’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.11 (Kluwer Law International 1986), pp.568-571.

US No.69, Fabergé International, Inc. v. Mr. Felice Di Pino, Supreme Court of New York County, Appellate Division, Not Indicated, 2 July 1985 in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.12 (Kluwer Law International 1987) pp.536-538.

‘US No.74, Brandeis Intsel Ltd. v. Calabrian Chemicals Corp., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Not indicated, 5 January 1987’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.13 (Kluwer Law International, 1988), pp.543-555.

‘US No.88, Mechanised Construction of Pakistan Ltd. v. American Construction Machinery & Equipment Corporation (ACME), United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Not indicated, 14 September 1987’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.15 (Kluwer Law International 1990), pp.539-542.

‘US No.100, Gould Inc., Gould Marketing, Inc. v. Hoffman Export Corporation, Gould International, Inc. v. Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Republic of Iran, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Not Indicated, 23 October 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.15 (Kluwer Law International 1990) pp.605-610.

‘US No.108, Sesostris S.A.E. v. Transportes Navales S.A., M/V Unamuno, United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, 28 December 1989’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.16 (Kluwer Law International, 1991), pp.640-645.

‘US No.110, National Oil Corporation v. Libyan Sun Oil Company, United States District Court, District of Delaware, Not indicated, 15 March 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.16 (Kluwer Law International 1991), pp.651-662.

‘US No.114, Tennessee Imports, Inc. v. Pier Paulo Filippi, United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division, Not Indicated, 14 August 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992), pp.620-638.

‘US No.115, International Standard Electric Corporation v. Bridas Sociedad Anonima Petrolera, Industrial y Comercial, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Not Indicated, 24 August 1990’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992), pp.639-652.

‘US No.119, Metallgesellschaft Limited v. Peter Montrose, Terry Willsone v. David L. Threlkeld & Co., Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Not Indicated, 15 January 1991’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International 1992) pp.672-681.

‘US No.146, John H. Brier v. Northstar Marine, Inc.; Shamrock Marine Towing; and Cape May Marine Services, Inc. (d/b/a Sea Tow of Southern New Jersey), United States District Court, District of New Jersey, 28 April 1992 and 1 July 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994) pp.766-774.

‘US No.147, Ronald H. Rileys v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd. and others, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, 91-1311, 17 July 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994), pp.775-780. 

‘US No.148, Euro-Mec Import, Inc. v. Pantrem & C., S.p.A., United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 92-2624, 16 November 1992’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.19 (Kluwer Law International 1994) pp.781-787.

‘US No.194, SAE Sadelmi SpA v. Papua New Guinea Electricity Commission, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 94 Civ. 2959 (SS), 29 November 1994’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996) pp.736-737. 

‘US No.196, Fitzroy Engineering, Ltd. v. Flame Engineering, Inc., United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 94 C 2029, 13 December 1994’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.744-750.

‘US No.197, Creighton Limited v. The Government of the State of Qatar (Ministry of Public Works), United States District Court, District of Columbia, 94-1035 RMU, 22 March 1995’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.21 (Kluwer Law International 1996), pp.751-758.

‘US No.229, M&C Corporation v. Erwin Behr GmbH Co., K.G., United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, 95-1390, 3 July 1996’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.993-1000.

‘US No.230, Chromalloy Aeroservices Inc. v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, United States District Court, District of Columbia, Civil No. 94-2339 (JLG), 31 July 1996’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997) pp.1001-1012.

‘US No.235, Generica Ltd. v. Pharmaceutical Basics, Inc. et al., United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 95 C 5935, 18 September 1996’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997), pp.1029-1039.

‘US No.238, Lander Company, Inc. v. MMP Investments, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 96-2648, 18 February 1997’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.22 (Kluwer Law International 1997) pp.1049-1060. 

‘US No.257, Kahn Lucas Lancaster, Inc. v. Lark International Ltd., United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 95 Civ. 10506 (DLC), 6 August 1997’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.23 (Kluwer Law International 1998), pp.1029-1037.

‘US No.261, Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons, W.L.L. v. Toys “R” Us, Inc. and TRU (HK) Limited, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 1757; Docket 96-9692, 10 September 1997’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.23 (Kluwer Law International 1998), pp.1058-1067. 

 ‘US No.267, Overseas Cosmos, Inc. v. NR Vessel Corp., United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 97 Civ. 5898 (DC), 8 December 1997’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.23 (Kluwer Law International 1998), pp.1096-1102.

‘US No.274, AAOT Foreign Economic Association (VO) Technostroyexport v. International Development and Trade Services, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 97-9075, 23 March 1998’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999), pp.813-816.

‘US No.280, Europcar Italia, S.p.A. v. Maiellano Tours, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 97-7224, 2 September 1998’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999), pp.860-870.

‘US No.288, Baker Marine (Nig.) Limited v. Chevron (Nig.) Limited, Chevron Corp., Inc. and others v. Danos and Curole Marine Contractors, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 97-9615; 97-9617, 12 August 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.24 (Kluwer Law International 1999) pp.909-914.

‘US No.294, Continental Grain Company, et al. v. Foremost Farms Incorporated, et al., United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 98 Civ. 0848 (DC), 23 March 1998’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.25 (Kluwer Law International 2000) pp.820-822.

‘US No.304, Black & Veatch International Company v. Wartsila NSD North America, Inc. and others, United States District Court, District of Kansas, Civil Action No. 97-2556-CTV, 18 December 1998’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.25 (Kluwer Law International 2000), pp.878-881.

‘US No.325, Martin I. Spier v. Calzaturificio Tecnica SpA, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 22 October 1999 and 29 November 1999’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.25 (Kluwer Law International 2000) pp.1042-1056. 

‘US No.338, Publicis Communication v. Publicis S.A., True North Communications Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 99-1199; 99-3424, 14 March 2000’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.25 (Kluwer Law International 2000), pp.1153-1157. 

‘US No.340, Coutinho Caro & Co. USA, Inc. v. Marcus Trading, Inc. and others, United States District Court, District of Connecticut, Civil Action No. 3:95cv2362; Civil Action No. 3:96cv2218; Civil Action No. 3:96cv2219, 14 March 2000’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.26 (Kluwer Law International 2001), pp.894-909.

‘US No.401, Millicom International V N.V. v. Motorola, Inc. and others, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 01 Civ. 2668 (SHS), 28 March 2002’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.27 (Kluwer Law International 2002) pp.948-959.

‘US No.404, Karaha Bodas Company (Cayman Island) v. Persusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara et al. (Indonesia), Persusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (Indonesia), United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 18 June 2003’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.28 (Kluwer Law International 2003), pp.908-964.

‘US No.422, Monegasque de Reassurances s.a.m. (Monde Re)(Monaco) v. NAK Naftogaz of Ukraine, State of Ukraine, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 15 November 2002’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.28 (Kluwer Law International 2003), pp.1096-1111.

‘US No.452, Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts, B.V. (Netherlands) v. Four Seasons Hotels Ltd. (Canada), Four Seasons Caracas and others, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, 02-23249-CIV-MOORE, 4 June 2003’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.29 (Kluwer Law International 2004), pp.882-899.

‘US No.520, Encyclopaedia Universalis S.A. (Luxembourg) v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (US), United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Docket No. 04-0288-cv, 31 March 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.30 (Kluwer Law International 2005), pp.1136-1143.

‘US No.522, Alto Mar Girassol (France) v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 04 C 7731, 12 April 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol. 30 (Kluwer Law International 2005), pp.1152-1157.

‘US No.539, Guang Dong Light Headgear Factory Co., Ltd. (PR China) v. ACI International, Inc. (US), United States District Court, District Court of Kansas, not indicated, 10 May 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.31 (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.1105-1124.

‘US No.546, Freudenberg-Nok, G.P. v. Auto Juntas, S.A., United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Not Indicated, 18 July 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.31 (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.1206-1210.

‘US No.557, Jiangsu Changlong Chemicals, Co., Inc. (PR China) v. Burlington Bio-Medical & Scientific Corporation (US), United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, not indicated, 22 November 2005’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.31 (Kluwer Law International 2006), pp.1316-1319.

‘US No.621, TermoRio S.A. E.S.P. (Colombia), LeaseCo Group and others v. Electranta S.P. (Colombia), et al., United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 06-7058, 25 May 2007’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008) pp.955-969. 

‘US No.634, Allan Millmaker d/b/a Pentomino Producing LLC (UK) v. Joe Bruso (US), Sovereign Oil & Gas Company II and others, United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Civil Action No. H-07-3837, 25 January 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.33 (Kluwer Law International 2008) pp.1103-1107. 

‘US No.654, Anthony N. LaPine (US) v. Kyocera Corporation (Japan), United States District Court, Northern District of California, 23 May 2008’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009) pp.951-965.

‘US No.678, AO Techsnabexport (Russian Federation) v. Globe Nuclear Services and Supply, Limited(US), United States District Court, District of Maryland, Civil Action No. AW-08-1521, 28 August 2009’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.34 (Kluwer Law International 2009), pp.1174-1185.

‘US No.729, Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC et al. v. Richard P. Nordan, as Ancillary Administrator for the Separate Estates of Stephen S. Helveston, Mike R. Teague, Jerko Gerald Zovko, and Wesley J.K. Batalona, United States District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina, Northern Division, 21 January 2011’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.36 (Kluwer Law International 2011), pp.425-427.

‘US No.731, Ameropa AG v. Havi Ocean Co. LLC, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 16 February 2011’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.36 (Kluwer Law International 2011), pp.433-434.

‘US No.793, Corporación Mexicana de Mantenimiento Integral, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. PEMEX-Exploración y Producción, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Case No. 10 Civ. 206 (AKH), 27 August 2013’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.38 (Kluwer Law International 2013) pp.537-541.

US No.880, Getma International v. The Republic of Guinea, United States District Court, District of Columbia, 9 June 2016 in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed), YCA, Vol.41 (Kluwer Law International 2016) pp.721-724.

Legislations

Australia: International Arbitration Act 1974, No. 136, Compilation No. 12, compiled on 17 November 2016, including amendments up to Act No.67, 2016, registered on 18 November 2016.

Belgium: Code of Civil Procedure, 19 May 1998.

Bulgaria: Law on the International Commercial Arbitration, 5 August 1988, amended 2 November 1993.

Decree of 12 May 1981, French New Code of Civil Procedure. 

Egypt: No. 27 of 1994 Promulgating the Law Concerning Arbitration in Civil and Commercial Matters, published in the Official Gazette No.16 (bis) on 21 April 1994.

English Arbitration Act 1975. 

English Arbitration Act 1979.

English Arbitration Act 1996. 

Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. Section 202.

German Code of Civil Procedure as promulgated on 5 December 2005 (Bundesgesetzblatt (BGBl., Federal Law Gazette) I page 3202; 2006 I page 431; 2007 I page 1781), last amended by Article 1 of the Act dated 10 October 2013 (Federal Law Gazette I page 3786).

Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (Panama Convention, 1975), 30 January 1975,  in Paulsson, J., Bosman, L.(eds), ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International 1984, Supplement No.2, August 1984), pp.1-4. 

Protocol on Arbitration Clauses, Geneva, signed on 24 September 1923, entered into force on 28 July 1924, League of Nations Treaty Series, Vol. 27, UN DOC E/AC.42/2, 16 February 1955. 

Swiss PILA.

The Decree No. 2011-48 of 13 January 2011, the French Code of Civil Procedure.

The Geneva Convention on Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1927.

The Swedish Arbitration Act. 

The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, concluded at Vienna on 23 May 1969, entered into force on 27 January 1980, United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol.1155, No.18232.

Tunisia: Law No. 93-42 of 26 April 1993 on the Enactment of Arbitration Code.

Turkey: International Arbitration Law, Law No. 4686 of 21 June 2001, published in the Official Gazette numbered 24453 and dated 5 July 2001.

‘Turkish Private International Law (Law No. 5718 of 27 November 2007)’, in Ali Yesilirmak and Ismail G. Esin (eds), Arbitration In Turkey (Kluwer Law International 2015), pp. 317-326.

Books and Articles 

Aboul-Enein, M. (2008), ‘The New York Convention of 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: What Needs to be Done for the Future?’, Disp. Resol. Int’l., Vol.2, pp.178-183. 

Afrazadeh, H. (2001), ‘Arbitrability under the New York Convention: the Lex Fori Revisited’, Arbitration International, Vol.17, Issue 1, pp.73-88. 

Alvarez, G.A., ‘Article II(2) of the New York Convention and the Courts’, in Albert van den Berg(ed)(1999) Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International), pp.67-81. 

Barcelo, J.J. (2017), ‘Kompetenz-Kompetez and Its Negative Effect-A Comparative View’, Cornell Law School Research Paper No. 17-40, pp.1-36.

Barry, M. (2015), ‘The Role of the Seat in International Arbitration: Theory, Practice and Implications for Australian Courts’, Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, Vol.32, Issue 3, pp.289-324.

Blessing, M. (1999), Introduction to Arbitration-Swiss and International Perspectives, edited by Nedim Peter Vogt, Basel; Frankfurt am Main: Helbing und Lichtenhahn, Swiss Commercial Law Series, Vol.10. 

Born, G.B. (2014), International Commercial Arbitration, 2nd edition, Kluwer Law International.

Braghetta, A. ‘The Framework of the International Arbitration System: the Challenge Derived from the Improper Conduct of Judicial Courts’, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed)(2013) International Arbitration: The Coming of a New Age?, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.17 (Kluwer Law International), pp.431-455. 

Brekoulakis, S.L. (2007), ‘The Notion of the Superiority of Arbitration Agreements over Jurisdiction Agreements: Time to Abandon It?’, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol.24, Issue 4, pp.341-364.

Brekoulakis, S. (2008), ‘Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Observations on the Efficiency of the Current System and Gradual Development of Alternative Means of Enforcement’, The American Review of International Arbitration, Vol.19, No.3-4, pp.415-446. 

Brekoulakis, S. (2009), ‘Law Applicable to Arbitrability: Revisiting the Revisited lex fori’, Queen Mary University of London, School of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No.21/2009, pp.99-120.

Brekoulakis, S.L. (2009), ‘On Arbitrability: Persisting Misconceptions and New Areas of Concern’, Queen Mary University of London, School of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No.20/2009, pp.19-45.

Brekoulakis, S. (2009), ‘The Negative Effect of Competence-Competence: The Verdict has to be Negative’, Queen Mary University of London, School of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No: 22/2009, pp.1-18.

Brekoulakis, S., Ribeiro, J and Shore, L., ‘UNCITRAL Model Law [Introductory remarks]’, in Loukas A. Mistelis (ed)(2015), Concise International Arbitration, 2nd edition, Kluwer Law International, pp.835-836. 

Briner, R. ‘Philosophy and Objectives of the Convention’ in the Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention-Experience and Prospects, New York Convention Day, 10th June 1998, United Nations Headquarters, 1999, pp.9-11.

Briner, R., Hamilton, V., ‘History and General Purpose of the Convention-The Creation of an International Standard to Ensure the Effectiveness of Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards’ in Emmanuel Gaillard, Domenico Di Pietro(eds)(2008), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards-The New York Convention in Practice, CMP Publishing Ltd., pp.3-37.

Burger, W.E., (1982), ‘Isn’t There a Better Way?’, American Bar Association Journal, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp.274-277. 

Carbonneau, T.E. (1989), Alternative Dispute Resolution: Melting the Lances and Dismounting the Seeds, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago.

Cardenas, E.J. ‘Benefits of Membership’, in Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention-Experience and Prospects, New York Convention Day, 10th June 1998, United Nations Headquarters, 1999, pp.14-15.

Collins, L., ‘The Law Governing the Agreement and Procedure in International Arbitration in England’, in Julien D.M. Lew(ed)(1987), Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration, Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V., pp.126-138.

Contini, P. (1959), ‘International Commercial Arbitration-The United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’, Am. J. Comp. L., Vol 8, pp.283-309.

Craig, W.L., Park, W.W. and Paulsson, J., ‘French Codification of a Legal Framework for International Commercial Arbitration: The Decree of May 12, 1981’, in Pieter Sanders (ed)(1982), YCA, Vol. VII (Kluwer Law International), pp.407-416.

Craig, W.L. (1995), ‘Some Trends and Developments in the Laws and the Practice of International Commercial Arbitration’, Tex. Int’l L. J., Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp.1-58.

Domke, M., Wilner, G. and Edmonson, L.E., Domke on Commercial Arbitration, (Westlaw, Database updated November 2017). 

Fons, M.P., Alonso, P.T., ‘Chapter 1: The New York Convention and the Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements by National Courts: What Level of Review?’ in Katia Fach Gomez and Ana M. Lopez-Rodriguez (eds)(2019), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges, Kluwer Law International, pp. 3-18.

Fouchard, P. ‘Suggestions to Improve the International Efficacy of Arbitral Awards’, in Albert van den Berg (ed)(1999) Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International), pp.601-614. 

Friedland, P.D., Hornick, R.N. (1995), ‘The Relevance of International Standards in the Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements under the New York Convention’, The American Review of International Arbitration, Vol. 6, No.2, pp.149-190.

Gaillard, E., Savage, J. (1999), Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, the Netherlands.

Gaillard, E., Banifatemi, Y., ‘Negative Effect of Competence-Competence: The Rule of Priority in Favour of the Arbitrators’ in E. Gaillard, D. Di Pietro (eds)(2008), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards – The New York Convention Practice, Cameron May, pp. 257-273.

Gaillard, E., ‘The Urgency of Not Revising the New York Convention’, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed) (2009), 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.14 (Kluwer Law International), pp.689-696. 

Gaillard, E. (2010), Legal Theory of International Arbitration, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp.24-35.

Gaillard, E. (2011), ‘France Adopts New Law on Arbitration’, New York Law Journal, Vol.245, No.15.

Gaillard, E. ‘The Present-Commercial Arbitration as a Transnational System of Justice: International Arbitration as a Transnational System of Justice’, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed)(2012), Arbitration: The Next Fifty Years, ICCA Congress Series, Vol. 16 (Kluwer Law International), pp.66-73.

Garnett, R. (2002), ‘International Arbitration Law: Progress towards Harmonisation’, Melb. J. Int’l. L., Vol.3, pp.400-413.

Giardina, A., ‘The Practical Application of Multilateral Conventions’, in Albert van den Berg (ed) (1999), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International), pp.440-451.

Glossner, O. (1989), ‘The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Some Thoughts After 30 Years-1958-1988’ in Pieter Sanders (ed)(1989), Arbitration in Settlement of International Commercial Disputes Involving the Far East and Arbitration in Combined Transportation, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.4, (Kluwer Law International), pp.275-279.

Graving, R.J. (1995), ‘Status of the New York Convention: Some Gaps in Coverage but New Acceptances Confirm its Vitality’, ICSID Review Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol.10, No.1, pp.1-53.

Griffith, G. Possible Issues for an Annex to the UNCITRAL Model Law-Experience and Prospects, New York Convention Day, 10th June 1998, United Nations Headquarters, 1999, pp.46-49.

Gusy, M. (2000), ‘The History and Significance of the New York Convention’, Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law & Arbitration, pp.147-155. 

Hale, T. (2014), ‘The Rule of Law in the Global Economy: Explaining Intergovernmental Backing for Private Commercial Tribunals’, European Journal of International Relations, pp.1-30.

Halvorsen, R., ‘Sweden’, in Emmanuel Gaillard (ed)(2010), The Review of International Arbitral Awards, IAI Series No:6, pp.145-153.

Hanotiau, B., Caprasse, O., ‘Introductory Report’, in Emmanuel Gaillard (ed)(2010), The Review of International Arbitral Awards, IAI Series No:6, pp.7-95.

Herrmann, G. ‘The 1958 New York Convention: Its Objectives and Its Future’ in Albert van den Berg (ed)(1999) Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International), pp.15-23.

Herrmann, G. ‘Does the World Need Additional Uniform Legislation on Arbitration?’ in Julien D.M. Lew, Loukas A. Mistelis(eds)(2007), Arbitration Insights-Twenty Years of the Annual Lecture of the School of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, pp.223-255. 

Hollander, P., Draye, M. (2012), Belgium, Arbitration Guide, IBA Arbitration Committee, pp. 1-28.

Holtzmann, H., ‘A Task for the 21st Century: Creating a New International Court for Resolving Disputes on the Enforceability of Arbitral Awards’, in M. Hunter, A. Marriott and V.V. Veeder(eds)(1995), The Internationalisation of International Arbitration-The LCIA Centenary Conference, Arbitration International, Graham&Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, UK, pp.109-114. 

Holtzmann, H.M., Neuhaus, J.E. (1995), A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration-Legislative History and Commentary, Wolters Kluwer. 

ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook for Judges, 2011. 

Jolles, A. (2006), Consequences of Multi-tier Arbitration Clauses: Issues of Enforcement, 72 Arbitration,  pp.329-338.

Kaplan, N. ‘New Developments on Written Form’ in Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention-Experience and Prospects, New York Convention Day, 10th June 1998, United Nations Headquarters, 1999, pp.17-19. 

Kaufmann-Kohler, G. (2003), Globalization of Arbitral Procedure, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 36, pp. 1313-1333.

Kayali, D. (2010), Enforceability of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses, Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, Vol. 27, Issue 6, pp.551-577.

Krauss, O. (2016), The Enforceability of Escalation Clauses Providing for Negotiations in Good Faith under English Law, McGill J. Disp. Resol., Vol.2, pp.142-165.

Kronke, H., Nacimiento, P. et al. (eds)(2010), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention, Kluwer Law International.

Kröll, S. ‘The Concept of Seat in the New York Convention and the Autonomy of Arbitral Award’, in Stavros Brekoulakis, Julien D.M. Lew, Loukas Mistelis(eds)(2016), The Evolution and Future of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, pp.79-96.

K.S., Harisankar (2013), ‘Supervisory Jurisdiction of Indian Courts in Foreign Seated Arbitration: The Beginning of a New Era or the End of Bhatia Doctrine?’, Arbitration Brief Vol.3, Issue 1, pp.56-64.

Lamm, C.B., ‘Comments on the Proposal to Amend the New York Convention’, in Albert Jan van den Berg(ed)(2009), 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.14 (Kluwer Law International), pp.697-707.

Lebedev, S., ‘How long does a foreign award stay enforceable?’, in Jan C. Schultsz, Albert Jan van den Berg(eds)(1982), The Art of Arbitration, Kluwer, Deventer, the Netherlands, pp.213-221. 

Lew, J.D.M., ‘The Law Applicable to the Form and Substance of the Arbitration Clause’, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed)(1999), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International), pp.114-145. 

Lew, J.D.M., Mistelis, L.A. and Kroll, S.M. (2003), Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International.

Lew, J.D.M. (2006), ‘Achieving the Dream: Autonomous Arbitration’, Arb. Int’l., Kluwer Law International, Vol.22, Issue 2, pp.179-203.

Lorenzen, E.G. (1934), ‘Commercial Arbitration-International and Interstate Aspects’, Yale L.J., Vol.43, pp.716-765. 

Lorenzen, E.G. (1935), ‘Commercial Arbitration-Enforcement of Foreign Awards’, Yale L.J., Vol.45, pp.39-68. 

Lundblad, C. (2012), Sweden, Arbitration Guide, IBA Arbitration Committe, pp.1-23. 

Mance, J., ‘England’, in Emmanuel Gaillard(ed)(2010), The Review of International Arbitral Awards, IAI Series No: 6, pp.111-143.

Mayer, P. ‘Revisiting Hilmarton and Chromalloy’, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed)(2001), International Arbitration and National Courts: The Never Ending Story, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.10 (Kluwer Law International) pp.165-176. 

McDermott, J.T. (1985-1986), ‘Significant Developments in the United States Law Governing International Commercial Arbitration’, Conn. J. Int’l L., Vol.1, pp.111-150. 

Menon, S. (2013), ‘Transnational Commercial Law: Realities, Challenges and A Call for Meaningful Convergence’, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, pp.231-252. 

Mistelis, L.A., Baltag, C. (2008), ‘Special Section-Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Settlement in International Arbitration: Corporate Attitudes and Practices’, The American Review of International Arbitration, Vol.19, pp.319-375.

Mistelis, L.A., Di Pietro, D., ‘New York Convention, Article IV [Formalities required to obtain recognition and enforcement]’ in Loukas A. Mistelis (ed)(2015), Concise International Arbitration, 2nd edition, Kluwer Law International, pp.16-18. 

Moses, M.L. (2012), The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.

Mourre , A. (2012), France, Arbitration Guide, IBA Arbitration Committe, pp.1-26. 

Mustill, M. (1989), ‘Arbitration: History and Background’, Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, Vol.6, Issue 2, pp.43-56. 

Norberg, C. R., ‘General Introduction to Inter-American Commercial Arbitration’, in Pieter Sanders(ed)(1978), YCA, Vol.III (Kluwer Law International), pp.1-14. 

Noussia, K. (2010), Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration- A Comparative Analysis of the Position under English, US, German and French Law, Springer. 

Nussbaum, A. (1942), ‘Treaties on Commercial Arbitration-A Test of International Private-Law Legislation’, Harvard Law Rev., Vol.56, Issue 2, pp.219-244.

Onyema, E., ‘Formalities of the Enforcement Procedure (Articles III and IV)’, in Emmanuel Gaillard, Domenico Di Pietro(eds)(2008), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards-The New York Convention in Practice, CMP Publishing Ltd., pp.597-612.

Pappas, V.F.L., Vlavianos, G.M. (2018), Multiple Tiers, Multiple Risks-Multi-tier Dispute Resolution Clauses, Dispute Resolution International, Vol.12, No.1, pp. 5-16.

Park, W.W., Yanos, A.A. (2006), ‘Treaty Obligations and National Law: Emerging Conflicts in International Arbitration’, Hastings L.J., Vol.58, pp.251-298.

Paulsson, J. (2010), ‘Arbitration in Three Dimensions’, LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No.2/2010, pp.1-34. 

Paulsson, M.R.P. (2016), The 1958 New York Convention in Action, Kluwer Law International.

Paulsson, M.R.P. (2017), The 1958 New York Convention From An Unusual Perspective: Moving Forward by Parting with It, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 23-42.

Perloff, S. (1992), ‘The Ties that Bind: The Limits of Autonomy and Uniformity in International Commercial Arbitration’, J. Int'l L., Vol.13, Issue 2, pp.323-350. 

Philip, A., ‘A Century of Internationalisation of International Arbitration: An Overview’, in  M. Hunter, A. Marriott and V.V. Veeder(eds)(1995), The Internationalisation of International Arbitration-The LCIA Centenary Conference, Arbitration International, Graham&Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, UK, pp.25-35. 

Polania, A., ‘General Introduction on Inter-American Commercial Arbitration(2003)’, in J. Paulsson, L. Bosman(eds), ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 1984, Supplement No.37, January 2003), pp.1-10. 

Posner, E.A. (1999), ‘Arbitration and Harmonization of International Commercial Law: A Defense of Mitsubishi’, Va. J. Int’l L., Vol.39, pp.647-670. 

Poudret, J.F., ‘Concluding Remarks on Relationship between State Courts and Arbitral Tribunals’, in Pierre A. Karrer(ed)(2001), Arbitral Tribunals or State Courts Who Must Defer to Whom?, ASA Swiss Arbitration Association IBA International Bar Association Conference in Zurich of January 28, 2001, Reports and Materials, ASA Special Series No.15, pp.147-166. 

Quigley, L.V. (1961), ‘Accession by the United States to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’, The Yale Law Journal, Vol.70, No.7, pp.1049-1082.

Read, P. (1999), ‘Delocalization on International Commercial Arbitration: Its Relevance in the New Millennium’, The American Review of International Arbitration, Vol. 10, No.2, pp. 177-201 (pp. 192, 193). 

Reiner, A., ‘The Form of the Agent’s Power to Sign an Arbitration Agreement and Article II(2) of the New York Convention’, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed)(1999), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.9, (Kluwer Law International), pp.82-92.

Salehijam, M. (2019), ‘Chapter 3: The Role of the New York Convention in Remedying the Pitfalls of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ in Katia Fach Gomez and Ana M. Lopez-Rodriguez (eds)(2019), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges, Kluwer Law International, pp.35-52.

Sanders, P. (1995), Unity and Diversity in the Adoption of the Model Law, Arbitration International, Kluwer Law International, Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 1-38.

Samuels, A. (1997), ‘How to Do It Properly: The Arbitration Act 1996’, Statute Law Review, Vol.18, Issue 1, pp.58-64.

Sanders, P. (1979), ‘A Twenty Years’ Review of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’, 13 Int'l L., pp.269-287.

Sanders, P., ‘The History of the New York Convention’, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed)(1999), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.9 (Kluwer Law International), pp.11-14.

Sanders, P., ‘The Making of the Convention’ in Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the New York Convention-Experience and Prospects, New York Convention Day, 10th June 1998, United Nations Headquarters, 1999, pp.3-5.

Sanders, P. (1999), Quo Vadis Arbitration?- Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice, Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands.

Schwebel, S.M., ‘The Creation and Operation of an International Court of Arbitral Awards’, in M. Hunter, A. Marriott and V.V. Veeder(eds)(1995), The Internationalisation of International Arbitration-The LCIA Centenary Conference, Arbitration International, Graham&Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, UK, pp.115-123.

Schwebel, S.M. (1996), ‘A Celebration of the United Nations New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’, Arbitration International, Vol.12, Issue 1, pp.83-88.

Shengchang, W., Lijun, C., ‘The Role of National Courts and Lex Fori in International Commercial Arbitration’, in J.D.M. Lew, L.A. Mistelis (2006), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, International Arbitration Law Library, Vol.15, Kluwer Law International, pp.155-183. 

Sheppard, A. (2003), ‘Interim ILA Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards’, Arbitration International, Kluwer Law International, Vol.19, Issue 2, pp.217-248.

Sheppard, A., ‘English Arbitration Act 1996 (Chapter 23) 1996-Arbitration Law in England, Wales and Northern Ireland’, in Loukas A. Mistelis (ed)(2015),  Concise International Arbitration, 2nd edition, Kluwer Law International, pp.997-1132. 

Silberman, L. (2009), ‘The New York Convention After Fifty Years: Some Reflections on the Law of National Law’, Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L., Vol.38, pp.25-46. 

Silberman, L.J., Scherer, M. (2013), ‘Forum Shopping and Post-Award Judgements’, New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, Paper 447, pp.313-345. 

Smith, E. (2002), ‘Vacated Arbitral Awards: Recognition and Enforcement Outside the Country of Origin’, B.U. Int’l L.J., Vol.20, pp.355-392. 

Tevendale, C., Ambrose, H. and Naish, V. (2015), Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses and Arbitration, Turkish Commercial Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 31-40.

Tirado, J.M., Acevedo, A. and Cosio, G., ‘Chapter 18: Time for a New NY Convention? Was Albert van den Berg Right?’ in Katia Fach Gomez and Ana M. Lopez-Rodriguez (eds)(2019), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges, Kluwer Law International, pp.295-314.

Van den Berg, A.J. (1981), The New York Convention of 1958, T.M.C. Asser Institute, The Hague: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.

Van den Berg, A.J. (1985), ‘When Is an Arbitral Award Nondomestic Under the New York Convention of 1958?’, Pace L. Rev., Vol.6, pp.25-65.

Van den Berg, A.J, ‘Some Practical Questions concerning the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’, in Uniform Commercial Law in the Twenty-First Century: Proceedings of the Congress of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, New York 18-22 May 1992 (United Nations, New York, 1995),p. 212-220. 

Van den Berg, A.J., ‘The New York Convention: Summary of Court Decisions’, in M. Blessing(ed)(1996), The New York Convention of 1958, ASA Special Series No.9, Zurich, pp.46-99.

Van den Berg, A.J. The New York Convention: ‘Its Intended Effect, Its Interpretation, Salient Problem Areas’, in M. Blessing(ed)(1996), The New York Convention of 1958, ASA Special Series No. 9, Zurich, pp.25-45. 

Van den berg, A.J. Striving for Uniform Interpretation-Experience and Prospects, New York Convention Day, 10th June 1998, United Nations Headquarters, 1999, pp. 41-44.

Van den Berg, A.J., ‘Refusals of Enforcement under the New York Convention 1958: the Unfortunate Few’, in Arbitration in the Next Decade-Special Supplement 1999, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, pp.75-94. 

Van den Berg, A.J., ‘The German Arbitration Act 1998 and the New York Convention 1958’, in Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, R. Briner, Y. Fortier, K.P. Berger and J. Bredow(eds)(2001), Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement the 21st Century-Liber Amicorum, Carl Heymanns, pp.783-794.

Van den Berg, A.J. (2007), ‘New York Convention of 1958: Refusals of Enforcement’, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol.18, No.2, pp.1-35.

Van den Berg, A.J. (2008), ‘A Closer Look at the Proposed “New New York Convention”’, Global Arbitration Review, Vol.3, Issue 3, pp.14-21.

Van den Berg, A.J, ‘The Future-What Will Change? Round Table Discussion’, in Albert Jan Van den Berg (ed)(2012), Arbitration: The Next Fifty Years, ICCA Congress Series, Vol.16, Kluwer Law International, pp.181-215.

Van Houtte, H., ‘Parallel Proceedings Before State Courts and Arbitration Tribunals: Is there a Transnational lis alibi pendens-exception in Arbitration or Jurisdiction Conventions?’, in Pierre A. Karrer(ed)(2001), Arbitral Tribunals or State Courts Who Must Defer to Whom?, ASA Swiss Arbitration Association IBA International Bar Association Conference in Zurich of January 28, 2001, Reports and Materials, ASA Special Series No.15, pp.35-54. 

Veeder, V.V. (2010), ‘Is there a Need to Revise the New York Convention?’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol.1, No.2, pp.499-506.

Von Mehren, A.T. (1986), ‘International Commercial Arbitration: The Contribution of the French Jurisprudence’, 46 La. L. Rev., Vol.46, Issue 5, pp.1045-1059. 

Von Segesser, G., George, A., ‘Swiss Private International Law Act (Chapter 12: International Arbitration), 1989’, in Loukas A. Mistelis (ed)(2015), Concise International Arbitration (2nd Edition), Kluwer Law International, pp.1189-1256. 

Wolaver, E.S. (1934), ‘The Historical Background of Commercial Arbitration’, 83 U. PA. L. REV., pp.132-146.

Wolff, R. (ed)(2012), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 Commentary, Germany: C.H., Beck, Hart, Nomos.

Zamora, J.M.A. Enhancing Dissemination of Information, Technical Assistance and Training-Experience and Prospects, New York Convention Day, 10th June 1998, United Nations Headquarters, 1999, pp. 39-40.

Electronic Sources

Boog, C., Menz, J.U. (2016), Landmark Swiss Decision on Failure to Comply with a Mandatory Pre-arbitral Tier, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/05/04/landmark-swiss-decision-failure-comply-mandatory-pre-arbitral-tier/?doing_wp cron=1595403772.3138461112976074218750.

Choudhary, U.A., Marking Their Territory: Bharat Aluminium v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services (2012), Wolters Kluwer 13 September 2012, available at http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/ blog/2012/09/13/marking-their-territory-bharat-aluminum-v-kaiser-aluminum-technical-services-2012/ (accessed on 29 June 2015).

Chronological table of Actions, available at http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention_status_chronological.html (accessed on 10 February 2016).

Dufetre, A.S., Honlet, J.C., Legum, B, and Dentons, (2016), France- Global Arbitration Review, available at http://globalarbitrationreview.com/know-how/topics/61/jurisdictions/ 28/france/ (accessed on 15 June 2016). 

ICC History-Merchants of Peace, available at http://www.iccwbo.org/about-icc/history/ (accessed on 19 July 2015). 

International Arbitration: Corporate Attitudes and Practices 2006, The School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary University of London and PricewaterhouseCoopers, available at http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/IAstudy_2006.pdf (accessed at 5 June 2020).

2018 International Arbitration Survey : The Evolution of International Arbitration, Queen Mary University of London and White&Case partnership, available at http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac. uk/media/arbitration/docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey---The-Evolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2).PDF (accessed at 15 April 2020).

List of Signatories to the Panama Convention, available at http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/b-35.html (Accessed on 6 June 2016).

Michaels, R., ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed)(2009), Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg and Oxford University Press, available at http://scholarship.law.duke. edu/faculty_scholarship/2076/ (accessed on 5 February 2015). 

1958 New York Convention Guide, available at http://newyorkconvention1958.org/ (accessed on 27 May 2017). 

Paulsson, M.R.P. (2018), The Future of the New York Convention in Its Most Extreme Sense: A Dual Convention that Disposes of National Setting Aside Regimes, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/08/15/the-future-of-the-new-york-convention/ (accessed on 16 August 2018).

Rees, H. (2010), ‘Where has International Commercial Arbitration Come From?’, available at http://hefinrees.wordpress.com/2010/06/ 11/where-has-international-commercial-arbitration-come-from/ (accessed on 30 May 2014).

Status, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), with amendments as adopted in 2006, available at https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_arbitration/status (updated on 17 November 2020).

Status Map, available at http://www.newyorkconvention.org/ contracting-states/status-map (accessed on 12 November 2017). 

Status table for the Signatories, available at https://uncitral.un.org/ en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards/status2 (accessed on 17 November 2020). 

The list of Contracting States for the Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, available at http://www.hcch.net/ index_en.php?act=conventions.status&cid=98 (accessed on 5 February 2015).


Yorum Yap

Lütfen yorum yazmak için oturum açın ya da kayıt olun.